Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Impact of intravitreal aflibercept dosing regimens in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice in France: results from the RAINBOW study
  1. Michel Weber1,
  2. Laurent Kodjikian2,
  3. Florence Coscas3,
  4. Céline Faure4,
  5. Isabelle Aubry5,
  6. Ingrid Dufour6,
  7. Salomon Y Cohen7
  1. 1CHU Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
  2. 2Centre Hospitalier de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France
  3. 3Centre Odéon, Paris, France
  4. 4Clinique Saint-Martin, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Caen, France
  5. 5Centre Ophtalmologique des Arceaux, Montpellier, France
  6. 6Bayer Healthcare SAS, Loos, France
  7. 7Centre d'Imagerie et de Laser, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to Professor Michel Weber; weber.michel{at}bbox.fr

Abstract

Objective To evaluate 12-month outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) stratified by intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) regimen.

Methods and analysis Patients included in the 12-month interim analysis of Real life of intravitreal Aflibercept In FraNce: oBservatiOnal Study in Wet AMD (RAINBOW), a 4-year, ongoing observational study conducted in France, were stratified by IVT-AFL dosing regimen. Safety (n=593) and effectiveness (n=428) data were analysed. Regimens included a regular cohort (three initial monthly IVT-AFL injections and ≥6 injections) and irregular cohorts (<6 injections) with and without three initial monthly injections. The main outcome measure was mean gain in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months.

Results Mean number of IVT-AFL injections was 6.0 (all patients, n=513), 7.2 (regular cohort, n=102), 6.1 (irregular cohort with three initial monthly injections, n=266) and 5.2 (irregular cohort without three initial monthly injections, n=60). Overall mean gain in BCVA at 12 months was 5 letters; +7.1 letters (regular cohort) and +5.6 letters (irregular cohort with three initial monthly injections), both p<0.001 versus baseline, and –1.1 letters (irregular cohort without three initial monthly injections), p=0.669. Improvements in BCVA were also significantly greater in the regular cohort (p<0.001) and irregular cohort with three initial monthly injections (p=0.003) compared with the irregular cohort without three initial monthly injections. Ocular and non-ocular adverse events were reported in 14.7% and 17.4% of all patients, respectively.

Conclusion Treatment-naïve patients with neovascular AMD receiving three initial monthly injections followed by regular or irregular injections over 12 months experienced better visual acuity outcomes than those receiving irregular treatment without three initial monthly injections.

Trial registration number NCT02279537.

  • treatment medical
  • drugs
  • vision
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Seattle, Washington, USA, 1–5 May 2016; 16th European Society of Retina Specialists Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8–11 September 2016; 2017 MaculArt Meeting: Imaging and Managing Macular Diseases, Paris, France, 2–4 July 2017; 123rd Congrès de la Société Française d’Ophtalmologie, France, Paris, 5–9 May 2017; 49th Annual Scientific Congress of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists, Perth, WA, Australia, 28 October–1 November 2017; 9th Annual Congress on Controversies in Ophthalmology: Europe, Athens, Greece, 22–24 March 2018; 124th Congrès de la Société Française d’Ophtalmologie, Paris, France, 5–8 May 2018.

  • Contributors MW, LK, FC, CF, IA, ID and SYC contributed to the design; data acquisition, analysis and interpretation; and preparation and final review of the manuscript.

  • Funding The RAINBOW study was sponsored by Bayer HealthCare SAS. The sponsor participated in the design and conduct of the study, analysis of the data and preparation of the manuscript. Medical writing assistance was provided by Nathan Ley, PhD, of PAREXEL and Louise Brady, PhD, of Apothecom, and was funded by Bayer HealthCare SAS.

  • Competing interests MW: Alcon, Alimera, Allergan, Bayer, Novartis, Thea. LK: AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Thea. FC: Allergan, Bayer, Novartis, Roche. CF: Allergan, Bayer, Novartis; IA: Bayer, Novartis. ID: employee of Bayer. SYC: Allergan, Bayer, Novartis, Thea, Tilak.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval No independent ethics committee and institutional review board approval was obtained as this is not required in France for observational studies. However, the RAINBOW study protocol was reviewed and approved by a French data privacy committee (Comité Consultatif sur le Traitement de l’Information en Matière de Recherche dans le Domaine de la Santé, and Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Availability of the data underlying this publication will be determined according to Bayer’s commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, time point and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified scientific and medical researchers patients-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research that can help advance medical science or improve patient care. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the Study sponsors section of the portal. Data access will be granted to anonymized patient-level data, protocols and clinical study reports after approval by an independant scientific review panel. Bayer is not involved in the decisions made by the independant review panel. Bayer will take all necessary measures to ensure that patient privacy is safeguarded.