Elsevier

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volume 50, Issue 3, May–June 2005, Pages 253-262
Survey of Ophthalmology

Major Review
Computer Vision Syndrome: A Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.008Get rights and content

Abstract

As computers become part of our everyday life, more and more people are experiencing a variety of ocular symptoms related to computer use. These include eyestrain, tired eyes, irritation, redness, blurred vision, and double vision, collectively referred to as computer vision syndrome. This article describes both the characteristics and treatment modalities that are available at this time. Computer vision syndrome symptoms may be the cause of ocular (ocular-surface abnormalities or accommodative spasms) and/or extraocular (ergonomic) etiologies. However, the major contributor to computer vision syndrome symptoms by far appears to be dry eye. The visual effects of various display characteristics such as lighting, glare, display quality, refresh rates, and radiation are also discussed. Treatment requires a multidirectional approach combining ocular therapy with adjustment of the workstation. Proper lighting, anti-glare filters, ergonomic positioning of computer monitor and regular work breaks may help improve visual comfort. Lubricating eye drops and special computer glasses help relieve ocular surface–related symptoms. More work needs to be done to specifically define the processes that cause computer vision syndrome and to develop and improve effective treatments that successfully address these causes.

Introduction

Twenty years ago, the advent of computers revolutionized the workplace. Until that time, office work had involved a range of activities including typing, filing, reading, and writing. Each activity was adequately varied in the requirements of posture and vision, posing a natural “break” from the previous activity. The introduction of computers, however, has combined these tasks to where most can be performed without moving from the desktop, thereby improving quality, production, and efficiency. In fact, it is estimated that the 75% of all jobs in the year 2000 involved computer usage.16 The popularity and affordability of personal computers with Internet capabilities at home has introduced even more computer users. In 1990, about 15% of U.S. households owned a computer, a number that has now increased to 50% of all households.73

Because of this extensive use of computers many studies have been conducted in an attempt to address questions concerning safety and health for video display terminal (VDT) users. The large majority of research has addressed the question of radiation levels from VDTs, known to emit many types of radiation including x-radiation, optical radiation, radio frequency radiation, very low frequency radiation, and extremely low frequency radiation.74, 93 Studies have not clearly indicated a negative effect on the computer user (Abelson MB: How to fight Computer Vision Syndrome. Rev Ophthalmol 114–6, 1999). During the late 1980s and early 1990s, concern of possible reproductive effects from using VDTs arose following reports of adverse pregnancy outcomes among groups of women computer users. A recent review concluded that for most women in modern offices, work with VDTs does not increase their risk of miscarriage 3, 21, 30, 44, 55 Another study has even revealed that somatic disorders, depression, and obsessions are increased with computer usage, especially when operating time is more than 30 hours per week and usage of more than 10 years.95

Studies have shown, however, that eye-related symptoms are the most frequently occurring health problems among VDT users.15, 16, 18, 80, 83, 87 The main visual symptoms reported by VDT users include eyestrain, tired eyes, irritation, burning sensation, redness, blurred vision, and double vision,4, 5, 13, 15, 18, 52, 85, 87 thus termed the phrase “Computer Vision Syndrome” (CVS). In 1992, a total of 1,307 surveys were completed by optometrists who reported that the majority of VDT patients have symptoms that are different than other near-point workers, especially as related to glare, lighting, unique viewing conditions, and spectacle requirements. Greater frequency and severity of symptoms were also noted.80 Travers and Stanton identified a trend in symptomatology, whereby symptoms appeared to increase as duration of VDT exposure increased.88 It is estimated according to some reports that the diagnosis and treatment of these symptoms costs almost US$ 2 billion each year (Abelson MB: How to fight Computer Vision Syndrome. Rev Ophthalmol 114–6, 1999). As computer users become more aware of CVS, it is important that ophthalmologists are attentive to this rapidly evolving disorder, as we could be facing a possible epidemic of the 21st century.

The purpose of this review is to examine the epidemiology, causes, and diagnosis of CVS; we will also present a review of the current treatments for CVS.

Section snippets

Definition

The ocular complaints experienced by computer users typically include eyestrain, eye fatigue, burning sensations, irritation, redness, blurred vision, and dry eyes, among others. The condition of a person experiencing one or more of these ocular complaints as a result of operating a computer and looking at a computer monitor is generally referred to as “Computer Vision Syndrome” (CVS). It is a repetitive strain disorder that appears to be growing rapidly, with some studies estimating that 90%

Symptomatology

It is quite clear from several studies that use of a VDT causes asthenopia. In fact, visual complaints were reported by 75% of VDT operators working 6–9 hours in front of their screens compared to 50% of other workers.60 Surveys of optometrists in the U.S. and the United Kingdom indicate that 12.4% and 9.0% of their patients, respectively, are examined primarily because of symptomatic visual or ocular problems associated with using a computer.60 Table 1 shows a categorization of the most common

Display Quality

The National Research Council Committee on Vision stated that “poor display quality … probably contributes to the annoyance and discomfort sometimes reported by workers. … Visual performance is affected by a number of display parameters, such as character size, structure, and style; and by image contrast and stability.”67 There appears to be little disagreement regarding the effect of monitor design and display quality on visual performance.

The images that are produced on a video display

Treatment

Without any doubt, the treatment of CVS requires a multidirectional approach due to the variety of complaints between users. When treating a patient, it is important to consider both ocular therapy as well as adjustment of the user's workstation and habits in an ergo-ophthalmologic approach.

Summary

The patient suffering from CVS can present to an eye care specialist in a variety of ways. A careful history and examination should reveal a correlation between VDT usage and ocular complaints. It appears that the best treatment includes a multi-directional approach including modifications in the ergonomics of the workstation, eyeglasses correction, lighting and environmental factors, and properly scheduled work breaks from the video screen. To most of us, computers have become an irreplaceable

Method of Literature Search

PubMed was the primary source of abstract search with keywords of computer vision syndrome, computers and eyestrain, computers and asthenopia, computers and ergonomics, video display terminals, computer monitors, computers and ergonomics, computers and liquid crystal display, and computers and dry eye. Google was also used as a Web search engine to find any additional information of the above-mentioned keywords. All articles from the year 1970 to 2004 pertaining to summary of computer vision

References (103)

  • S.M. Berman et al.

    Human electroretinogram responses to video displays, fluorescent lighting, and other high frequency sources

    Optom Vis Sci

    (1991)
  • P.S. Best et al.

    Relations between individual differences in oculomotor resting states and visual inspection performance

    Ergonomics

    (1996)
  • W.D. Bockelmann

    [Optimal ocular correction for computer operators]

    Klin Oczna

    (1995)
  • S.P. Butzon et al.

    Prescribing for the moderate-to-advanced ametropic presbyopic VDT user. A comparison of the Technica Progressive and Datalite CRT trifocal

    J Am Optom Assoc

    (1997)
  • F.W. Campbell et al.

    The visual display terminal issue: a consideration of its physiological, psychological and clinical background

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt

    (1983)
  • J.B. Carter et al.

    Musculoskeletal problems in VDT work: a review

    Ergonomics

    (1994)
  • R.A. Cheu

    Good vision at work

    Occup Health Saf

    (1998)
  • B.L. Cole et al.

    Effect of VDUs on the eyes: report of a 6-year epidemiological study

    Optom Vis Sci

    (1996)
  • M. Collins et al.

    VDT screen reflections and accommodation response

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt

    (1993)
  • Collins MJ, Bowman KJ, et al: Visual discomfort and VDTs. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (Worksafe,...
  • M.A. Costanza

    Visual and ocular symptoms related to the use of video display terminals

    J Behav Optom

    (1994)
  • H.M. Culhane et al.

    Dynamic accommodation and myopia

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1999)
  • S.J. Dain et al.

    Symptoms in VDU operators

    Am J Optom Physiol Opt

    (1988)
  • K.M. Daum

    Accommodative dysfunction

    Doc Ophthalmol

    (1983)
  • B.I. Davydov et al.

    [Video display terminals: their electromagnetic safety]

    Aviakosm Ekolog Med

    (1992)
  • V. Delpizzo

    Epidemiological studies of work with video display terminals and adverse pregnancy outcomes(1984–1992)

    Am J Ind Med

    (1994)
  • V.A. Doskin et al.

    [Hygienic evaluation of artificial lighting in the classroom for studying information science and computer technics in secondary schools]

    Gig Sanit

    (1989)
  • A.A. Feigin et al.

    [Prevention of visual fatigue in computer users by eyeglasses with spectral filters]

    Vestn Oftalmol

    (1998)
  • A. Fenety et al.

    Short-term effects of workstation exercises on musculoskeletal discomfort and postural changes in seated video display unit workers

    Phys Ther

    (2002)
  • K.D. Garcia et al.

    Effect of glare on performance of a VDT reading-comprehension task

    Hum Factors

    (1985)
  • P. Goodwin

    Evaluation of methodology for evaluating lighting for offices with VDTs

    J Illumin Eng Soc

    (1987)
  • P. Goodwin

    Evaluation of lighting system parameters for offices with VDTs

    Light Design Applic

    (1985)
  • Grandjean E, Oldroyd H: Fitting the Task to the Man. London, Taylor & Francis, pp 1–363,...
  • A.H. Grant

    The computer user syndrome

    J Am Optom Assoc

    (1987)
  • P. Grasso et al.

    Exposure to video display terminals and risk of spontaneous abortion

    Am J Ind Med

    (1997)
  • I. Gratton et al.

    Change in visual function and viewing distance during work with VDTs

    Ergonomics

    (1990)
  • P.I. Gumener et al.

    [Hygienic problems in the use of computers by school children with refractive disorders]

    Gig Sanit

    (1996)
  • S. Gur et al.

    Objective evaluation of visual fatigue in VDU workers

    Occup Med (Lond)

    (1994)
  • A. Hedge et al.

    Effects of lensed-indirect and parabolic lighting on the satisfaction, visual health, and productivity of office workers

    Ergonomics

    (1995)
  • S. Henifin

    Office work can be dangerous to your health

    (1983)
  • H.J. Hentschel et al.

    Energy-effective direct indirect office and VDU-lighting systems-test and application

    J Illumin Eng Soc

    (1987)
  • H. Heuer

    [Computer display work and rest position of the vergence system]

    Z Exp Angew Psychol

    (1993)
  • A. Hladky et al.

    Using a screen filter positively influences the physical well-being of VDU operators

    Cent Eur J Public Health

    (1998)
  • G.V. Hulgren et al.

    Discomfort glare and disturbances from light reflections in an office landscape with CRT display terminals

    Appl Ergonom

    (1974)
  • W. Jaschinski et al.

    Accommodation, convergence, pupil diameter and eye blinks at a CRT display flickering near fusion limit

    Ergonomics

    (1996)
  • W. Jaschinski et al.

    A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes

    Ergonomics

    (1999)
  • W. Jaschinski et al.

    Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences

    Ergonomics

    (1998)
  • W. Jaschinski-Kruza

    Eyestrain in VDU users: viewing distance and the resting position of ocular muscles

    Hum Factors

    (1991)
  • R. Kavet et al.

    VDTs: field levels, epidemiology, and laboratory studies

    Health Phys

    (1991)
  • A. Kennedy et al.

    The effects of flicker on eye movement control

    Q J Exp Psychol A

    (1991)
  • Cited by (562)

    • Real-Time bubble counting for sensing petroleum valve closure leakage

      2024, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors reported no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article.

    View full text