Medical Decision MakingDoes the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing decision for breast cancer surgery?
Section snippets
Background
Patient participation in health care is regarded as desirable ethically, legally and socially [1]. Though studies focusing on Caucasian cancer patients’ preferred participation in treatment decision making demonstrated most patients preferred an active or a shared role in decision-making, for some patients a passive role in decision-making is favored [2]. The congruence between patient preferences in decision involvement and actual levels of involvement has been linked to easier treatment
Sample and setting
The present study, part of a pre-intervention study evaluating the effectiveness of training surgeons to promote shared decision-making in breast surgical settings, was conducted at two Hong Kong government-funded breast centers. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Hong Kong and of the two participating hospitals.
Sample characteristics
A total of 596 potential participants were identified. Of these, 492 gave consent to participate (83%). We randomly selected 40% of the consultations to be coded in the present study. Of the 298 randomly selected consultations, 15 recordings were unavailable for technical reasons. Hence, a total of 283 were available for assessment.
Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients. A majority of participants (92%) were accompanied, with 59% having one, 30% two, and
Discussion
The present study examined the extent to which shared decision-making was adopted in Hong Kong breast surgery consultations. Shared decision-making is a mutual, interactive process involving the doctor and patient in various aspects of decision-making including information exchange, acknowledging patient's values and preferences, deliberations regarding treatment options, deciding a treatment [22], and eliciting patients’ psychosocial concerns [13]. Our findings showed that the initial breast
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the Hong Kong Cancer Fund and a grant from Health Services Research Fund (Grant No. 07080651), Food and Health Bureau, The Government of Hong Kong, SAR.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank to (1) Professor Phyllis Butow for providing us with the oncology-specific shared-decision making coding system, (2) our research assistants for the contributions of the data collection and management, and (3) the women and surgeons who participated in the study.
References (32)
- et al.
Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review
Ann Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Communication matters: the impact of communication and participation in decision making on breast cancer patients’ depression and quality of life
Patient Educ Couns
(2009) - et al.
Sharing decisions in cancer care
Soc Sci Med
(2001) - et al.
Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context
Patient Educ Couns
(2010) - et al.
Sharing vs. caring – the relative impact of sharing decisions versus managing emotions on patient outcomes
Patient Educ Couns
(2011) - et al.
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model
Soc Sci Med
(1999) - et al.
Modeling patient-centered communication: oncologist relational communication and patient communication involvement in breast cancer adjuvant therapy decision-making
Patient Educ Couns
(2009) The influence of gender on the doctor–patient interaction
Patient Educ Couns
(2009)- et al.
Cancer patients: teir desire for information and participation in treatment decisions
J R Soc Med
(1989) - et al.
Participation and satisfaction with surgical treatment decision-making in breast cancer among Chinese women
Breast Cancer Res Treat
(2003)