Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 120, Issue 8, August 2013, Pages 1533-1540
Ophthalmology

Original article
Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor for Glaucoma Progression: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.032Get rights and content

Purpose

To evaluate the role of corneal hysteresis (CH) as a risk factor for the rate of visual field progression in a cohort of patients with glaucoma followed prospectively over time.

Design

Prospective observational cohort study.

Participants

The study group included 114 eyes of 68 patients with glaucoma followed for an average of 4.0±1.1 years. Visual fields were obtained with standard automated perimetry. Included eyes had a median number of 7 (range, 5–12) tests during follow-up.

Methods

The CH measurements were acquired at baseline using the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Instruments, Depew, NY). Evaluation of rates of visual field change during follow-up was performed using the visual field index (VFI). Linear mixed models were used to investigate the relationship between rates of visual field loss and baseline CH, baseline intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT), while adjusting for potentially confounding factors. An interaction term between IOP and CH was included in the model to investigate whether the effect of IOP on rates of progression depended on the level of CH.

Main Outcome Measures

Effects of CH, IOP, and CCT on rates of VFI loss over time.

Results

The CH had a significant effect on rates of visual field progression over time. In the univariable model including only CH as a predictive factor along with time and their interaction, each 1 mmHg lower CH was associated with a 0.25%/year faster rate of VFI decline over time (P < 0.001). The multivariable model showed that the effect of IOP on rates of progression depended on CH. Eyes with high IOP and low CH were at increased risk for having fast rates of disease progression. The CH explained a larger proportion of the variation in slopes of VFI change than CCT (17.4% vs. 5.2%, respectively).

Conclusions

The CH measurements were significantly associated with risk of glaucoma progression. Eyes with lower CH had faster rates of visual field loss than those with higher CH. The prospective longitudinal design of this study supports the role of CH as an important factor to be considered in the assessment of the risk of progression in patients with glaucoma.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

This was an observational cohort study. Participants from this study were included in a prospective longitudinal study designed to evaluate optic nerve structure and visual function in glaucoma (Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study [DIGS]) conducted at the Hamilton Glaucoma Center, University of California, San Diego. Participants in the DIGS were longitudinally evaluated according to a pre-established protocol that included regular follow-up visits in which patients underwent clinical

Results

The study included 114 eyes of 68 patients with glaucoma followed for an average of 4.0±1.1 years (range, 2.0–6.5 years). Included eyes had a median number of 7 (range, 5–12) visual field tests during follow-up. Table 1 shows baseline clinical and demographic information for the eyes included in the study. Figure 1 shows a scatterplot matrix illustrating the relationship among GAT IOP, CCT, and CH. The GAT IOP was significantly influenced by CCT (r=0.36; P < 0.001) but not by CH (r=0.01; P

Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that CH was significantly associated with the rate of visual field loss in a cohort of patients with glaucoma followed over time. Eyes with lower baseline hysteresis tended to progress significantly faster than those with higher hysteresis values. Such relationship was present even in a multivariable model adjusting for other factors known to potentially affect rates of glaucoma progression. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective longitudinal study

References (43)

  • D.C. Hood et al.

    A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage

    Prog Retin Eye Res

    (2007)
  • Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma

    Ophthalmology

    (2001)
  • F.A. Medeiros et al.

    Who should be treated?

  • Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study

    Ophthalmology

    (2005)
  • M.A. Kass et al.

    The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2002)
  • The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2000)
  • F.A. Medeiros et al.

    The relationship between intraocular pressure and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma

    Ophthalmology

    (2009)
  • M.O. Gordon et al.

    The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2002)
  • J.B. Jonas et al.

    Central corneal thickness and thickness of the lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera in monkeys

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2009)
  • J.B. Jonas et al.

    Central corneal thickness and thickness of the lamina cribrosa in human eyes

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2005)
  • C.V. De Moraes et al.

    Lower corneal hysteresis is associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression

    J Glaucoma

    (2012)
  • Cited by (223)

    • Five-Year Visual Field Outcomes of the HORIZON Trial

      2023, American Journal of Ophthalmology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Manuscript no. 2012-1597.

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have made the following disclosure(s): FAM has received research support from Reichert, Inc, and Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. LMZ and RNW have received research support from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. RNW is a consultant to Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.

    Supported in part by National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute Grants EY021818 (F.A.M.), EY11008 (L.M.Z.), and EY14267 (L.M.Z.); CAPES Grant BEX 1066/11-0; an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY); and grants for participants' glaucoma medications from Alcon, Allergan, Pfizer, Merck, and Santen.

    View full text