Table 4

Associations between cardiovascular risk score (FRS) and retinal arteriolar structural and functional measures both at 5-year follow-up

5-year FRS,
each one score↑
Retinal microvascular measures at 5-year follow-up β (95% CI)P value
Retinal arteriolar calibre, µm
Model 1−0.2 (−0.4 to 0.1)0.23
Model 2−0.02 (−0.3 to 0.3)0.92
Model 3−0.1 (−0.5 to 0.3)0.58
Retinal arteriolar fractal dimension, df(×10−2)
Model 1−0.3 (−0.5 to 0.04)0.02
Model 2−0.2 (−0.5 to 0.1)0.15
Model 3−0.3 (−0.7 to 0.1)0.14
Retinal arteriolar branching angle, degree
Model 1−0.2 (−0.4 to 0.1)0.16
Model 2−0.2 (−0.5 to 0.1)0.27
Model 30.1 (−0.3 to 0.4)0.75
Retinal arteriolar DVA dilation, %
Model 10.02 (−0.05 to 0.01)0.59
Model 20.05 (−0.04 to 0.14)0.27
Model 30.07 (-0.04 to 0.18)0.23
Retinal arteriolar DVA constriction, %
Model 10.01 (−0.06 to 0.08)0.82
Model 2−0.02 (−0.1 to 0.07)0.59
Model 3−0.05 (−0.2 to 0.06)0.35
  • Model 1: unadjusted.

  • Model 2: adjusted for age, ethnicity and college degree.

  • Model 3: model 2 and additionally adjusted for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis and prepregnancy body mass index at baseline (26–28 weeks gestation).

  • DVA, dynamic vessel analyser; FRS, Framingham Risk Score.