Table 4

Comparison of vision as per logMAR chart before and after intervention in experimental and control group

Vision as per logMAR chartExperimental group n1=35 n (%)χ2 (df) p valueControl group n2=35 n(%)Fisher exact (df) p value
PreinterventionPostinterventionPreinterventionPostintervention
Affected eye6.986.22
 0.005 (12.8)6 (15.4)(9)1 (2.7)1 (2.7)(9)
 0.100.630.7
 0.206 (15.4)11 (28.2)9 (24.3)5 (13.5)
 0.304 (10.3)5 (12.8)1 (2.7)3 (8.1)
 0.401 (2.6)1 (2.6)2 (5.4)
 0.5010 (25.6)5 (12.8)10 (27.0)8 (21.6)
 0.604 (10.3)5 (12.8)1 (2.7)3 (8.1)
 0.702 (5.1)1 (2.6)1 (2.7)1 (2.7)
 0.802 (5.1)3 (7.7)5 (13.5)4 (10.8)
 1.03 (7.7)2 (5.4)4 (10.8)
 1.12 (5.1)2 (5.1)7 (18.9)6 (16.2)
Occluded eye6.58
 0.005 (16.1)6 (19.4)12.596 (18.2)5 (15.2)(7)
 0.10(9)0.47
 0.203 (9.7)8 (25.8)0.1811 (33.3)10 (30.3)
 0.303 (9.7)3 (9.7)1 (3.0)1 (3.0)
 0.401 (3.2)2 (6.1)2 (6.1)
 0.505 (16.1)2 (6.5)6 (18.2)3 (9.1)
 0.602 (6.5)5 (16.1)5 (15.2)
 0.702 (6.5)
 0.804 (12.9)4 (12.9)4 (12.1)5 (15.2)
 1.05 (16.1)1 (3.2)2 (6.1)1 (3.0)
 1.12 (6.5)1 (3.2)1 (3.0)1 (3.0)
  • N=70.

  • *Four children from experimental and 2 from the control group had both eyes affected so 39 affected eyes in experimental and 37 in control group.