Table 2

Relationship between retinal vascular parameters with glaucoma-associated outcomes

Study and yearStudy typeSample sizeMethod of assessmentOutcomeChanges in parameters in association with glaucoma
Arteriolar calibreVenular calibreFractal dimensionTortuosityBranching angle
Tham et al 87
(Singapore Malay Eye study) (2013)
Population-based, cross-sectional studyHealthy: 352SIVARNFL thicknessReducedReducedReducedReduced
Kim et al 89 (2012)Hospital-based, case-control studyHealthy: 48
NTG: 67
VisupacRNFL thicknessReducedNot significant
Koh et al 98
(Singapore Malay Eye Study) (2010)
Population-based, cross-sectional studyHealthy: 2641SIVANeuroretinal rim areaReduced
Zheng et al 65
(Singapore Malay Eye Study) (2009)
Population-based, cross-sectional studyHealthy: 2599
Any glaucoma: 107
IVANRNFL thicknessReducedReduced
Cheung et al 88
(Sydney Childhood Eye Study) (2008)
Population-based, cross-sectional studyHealthy: 1204OptimateRNFL thicknessReducedReduced
Lim et al 90 (2009)Hospital-based, cross-sectional studyHealthy: 104OptimateRNFL thicknessReducedReduced
CDRNot significantReduced
Samarawickrama et al 91
(Sydney Childhood Eye Study) (2003)
Population-based, cross-sectional studyHealthy: 2038OptimateRNFL thicknessReducedReduced
Hall et al 92
(2001)
Hospital-based case seriesPOAG: 64ManualVFDReducedNot significant
Jonas and Naumann86 (1989)Hospital-based, case-control studyHealthy: 173
POAG: 281
ManualCDRReducedReduced
RNFL thicknessReducedReduced
VFDReducedReduced
  • CDR, cup–disc ratio; NTG, normal tension glaucoma; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; RNFL, retinal nerve fibre layer; VFD, visual field defect; SIVA, Singapore ‘I’ Vessel Assessment.