Table 3

Comparing functional and anatomical response in different diseases

VariablesnAMD (N=50)DMO (N=37)RVO (N=30)P value*
≥5 ETDRS letters increase (%)31 (62)12 (32)21 (70)0.003†
≥15 ETDRS letters increase (%)16 (32)2 (5)13 (43)<0.005‡
≥10% decrease in CMT (%)27 (54)24 (65)23 (77)0.122
  • Data are presented as the number of individuals and corresponding percentages.

  • *Global p values testing for a difference between any of the diseases with a χ2 test are given. For comparisons that are significant at the global level, adjusted pairwise p values for individual study comparisons are reported. Significant p values are in bold.

  • nAMD vs DMO p<0.05; DMO vs RVO p<0.05; nAMD vs RVO p>0.05.

  • nAMD vs DMO p<0.05; DMO vs RVO p<0.05; nAMD vs RVO p>0.05.

  • CMT, central macular thickness; DMO, diabetic macular oedema; ETDRS, early treatment diabetic retinopathy study; nAMD, neovascular age-related macular degeneration; RVO, retinal vein occlusion.