@article {Asaokae000900, author = {Ryo Asaoka and Akio Oishi and Yuri Fujino and Hiroshi Murata and Keiko Azuma and Manabu Miyata and Ryo Obata and Tatsuya Inoue}, title = {Association between the number of visual fields and the accuracy of future prediction in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, elocation-id = {e000900}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000900}, publisher = {BMJ Specialist Journals}, abstract = {Purpose To evaluate the minimum number of visual fields (VFs) required to precisely predict future VFs in eyes with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).Methods A series of 12 VFs (Humphrey Field Analyzer 10{\textendash}2 test (8.9 years in average) were analysed from 102 eyes of 52 patients with RP. The absolute error to predict the 12th VF using the prior 11 VFs was calculated in a pointwise manner, using the linear regression, and the 95\% CI range was determined. Then, using 3{\textendash}10 initial VFs, next VFs (4th to 11th VFs, respectively) were also predicted. The minimum number of VFs required for the mean absolute prediction error to reach the 95\% CI was identified. Similar analyses were iterated for the second and third next VF predictions. Similar analyses were conducted using mean deviation (MD).Results In the pointwise analysis, the minimum number of VFs required to reach the 95\% CI for the 12th VF was five (first and second next VF predictions) and six (third next VF prediction). For the MD analysis, three (first and second next VF predictions) and four (third next VF prediction) VFs were required to reach 95\% CI for the 12th VF.Conclusions The minimum number of VFs required to obtain accurate predictions of the future VF was five or six in the pointwise analysis and three or four in the analysis with MD.Data are available upon reasonable request. NA.}, URL = {https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000900}, eprint = {https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000900.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open Ophthalmology} }