Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P20-A129 An innovative wound healing method reveals a donor and post-mortem time-dependent regeneration of corneal epithelium
  1. Filippo Bonelli1,
  2. Umberto Rodella1,2,
  3. Elisa Fasolo1,
  4. Vanessa Barbaro1,
  5. Ilaria Zorzi1,
  6. Jana D’Amato Tóthová2,
  7. Stefano Ferrari1
  1. 1Fondazione Banca degli Occhi del Veneto (FBOV), Italy
  2. 2Research and Development, AL.CHI.MI.A. S.R.L, Italy


Purpose The aim of this study was to establish and optimize a new and reproducible epithelial wound healing model on human corneas. This assay was used to study the kinetics of epithelial regeneration following a chemical injury.

Methods Thirty (n=30) human corneas unsuitable for transplant were used for the experiments. Corneas were cultured in Storagix medium (FBOV) at 31°C. Epithelial integrity before the beginning of the experiments (pre-wound) was assessed using the vital dyes trypan blue (TB, TB-S 0.25%, AL.CHI.MI.A. srl) and sodium fluorescein (Fluo). 1-heptanol soaked paper disks (6 mm) were applied in the centre of the corneas for 1’ to trigger a chemical damage at the epithelial layer. Afterwards, sodium fluorescein and TB stainings were repeated to quantify the damaged area and to monitor healing progression. The damaged area (mm2) was calculated for each time point with Fiji software. Wound healing rate (HR, mm2/die) was calculated for both Fluo (HRF) and TB (HRTB) measurements using the previously described formula:

Arithmetical averages (HRFAVG and HRTBAVG) of HRs were calculated and correlated by Pearson correlation coefficient with the following donor’s parameters: age, sex, post-mortem time (PMT, time between death and tissue procurement), stromal defects, septicaemia, body temperature, diabetes.

Results The execution of the heptanol wounding is highly reproducible, as highlighted by Fluo and TB staining. The average time for full recovery from wounding was 3,8 ± 0,41 days for Fluo and 3,5 ± 0,63 days for TB. Fluo and TB stainings are interchangeable as they significantly correlate (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.630; p>0.05). A negative linear correlation was observed between HR and PMT (HRFAVG: corrected R2: 0.243, p = 0.003; HRTBAVG: corrected R2: 0,132, p = 0.028), but not with the other donors’ parameters.

Conclusion Our wound/healing model might be of great interest for studies of epithelial regeneration kinetics and validation of drugs for the treatment of ocular defects. The inverse correlation between PMT and HR provides valuable insights for scientists investigating the regenerative properties of the corneal epithelium, as well as for eye bank personnel aiming to preserve the regenerative potential of corneal epithelium.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.