You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Uveitis
Original research
Risk factors for ocular toxoplasmosis among uveitis patients in Kinshasa, DR Congo
  1. Nadine Nsiangani Lusambo1,
  2. Dieudonné Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo2,
  3. Dieudonné Mumba Ngoyi2,
  4. Pierre Akilimali Zalagile2,
  5. Alejandra de-la-Torre3
  1. 1Eye Department, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
  2. 2Department of Parasitology, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
  3. 3Immunology, Universidad Del Rosario Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Bogotá, Colombia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nadine Nsiangani Lusambo; lnsiangani{at}yahoo.fr

Abstract

Objective To identify the risk factors associated with ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) in a cohort of Congolese patients with uveitis.

Methods and analysis A cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2020 and July 2021 in two ophthalmic clinics in Kinshasa. Patients with a diagnosis of uveitis were enrolled in the study. Each patient underwent an interview, an ophthalmological examination and serology testing. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for OT.

Results 212 patients were included in the study with a mean age at presentation of 42.1±15.9 years (limits: 8–74 years) and a sex ratio of 1.1:1. OT concerned 96 patients (45.3%). The age of the patients below 60 years (p=0.001, OR=9.75 CI 95% 2.51 to37.80)), the consumption of cat meat (p=0.01, OR=2.65 CI 95% 1.18 to 5.96)) and undercooked meat (p=0.044, OR=2.30 CI 95% 1.02 to 5.21)) and living in rural area (p=0.021, OR=11.4 (CI 95% 1.45 to 89.84])) were identified as risk factors for OT.

Conclusion OT affects more young people. It is associated with dietary habits. Informing and educating the population is necessary to avoid infection.

  • infection
  • retina
  • epidemiology
  • eye (globe)

Data availability statement

No data are available.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001198

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

    • Toxoplasmosis is the leading aetiology of infectious posterior uveitis worldwide. The pathology is more frequent in tropical areas. Depending on the region, different sociodemographic and environmental factors influence the occurrence of ocular toxoplasmosis.

    WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

    • This study is first carried out on patients with ocular toxoplasmosis in Central Africa. This study shows that young people were more affected, and eating habits (domestic cats) were the risk factor for the disease, in this part of the world.

    HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

    • The results of this study support the view that information and education of the population to avoid some risky eating behaviours would help to reduce the prevalence of the pathology in the region.

    Introduction

    Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan and the causative agent of toxoplasmosis, one of the most prevalent parasitic infections that affect humans and other warm-blooded animals.1–3 It is estimated that approximately one-third of the human population worldwide has the parasite.2 3

    Humans are infected by ingesting sporulated oocysts in raw or undercooked meat, contact with cat faeces from the soil, and consuming contaminated food or water.1 3 Other rare transmission causes included transplacental transmission to the fetus, blood transfusion and organ transplant from infected donors.1 4

    The prevalence of human Toxoplasma infection varies in different parts of the world, it can range from 10% to 50% in temperate developed countries to over 80% in developing countries of the tropics.5 The infection is more prevalent in a warm and humid climate and is lower in cold regions, probably due to the poor survival of the oocyst stage of the parasite under freezing conditions.1 3 4 6 Low seroprevalence has been reported in South East Asia, North America and Europe, whereas high seroprevalence is observed in Latin America and tropical African countries.7 Central Africa has the highest reported prevalence rates, and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has the highest rate among these countries.8 9

    The most common clinical manifestation of toxoplasmosis involves the eye in the form of retinochoroiditis10; it is the leading cause of infectious posterior uveitis in non-immunocompromised individuals worldwide.6 11 12 Although ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) results from both congenital and acquired infections, eye disease acquired after birth is much more common than congenital infection.6 11–13 OT may occur immediately or long after the initial infection or during reactivation.3 The disability-adjusted life years calculated for toxoplasmosis (both congenital and postnatally acquired) were equivalent to that of tuberculosis.10 When the disease is acquired after birth, retinochoroiditis accounts for almost the entire burden.10

    OT is considered a significant cause of uveitis in Africa, but a few studies describe the epidemiology of the disease on this continent.10 In DRC, toxoplasmosis is the patients’ most common aetiology of uveitis.14

    People with OT experimented with worse vision-related quality of life.15 Retinal toxoplasmosis is recognised as a significant cause of blindness in many parts of the world.4 16 Overall, 24% of patients with OT developed legal blindness in one eye, generally from retinitis and subsequent scarring within the macula, retinal detachment or optic atrophy.17

    The prevalence of OT in a population is dependent on the overall prevalence of infection in the population.6 Due to the severity and irreversibility of ocular lesions caused by T. gondii, knowledge about this infection’s social and epidemiological factors is essential to apply adequate intervention for prevention.18 Therefore, the prevention of toxoplasmosis is primarily directed toward health education related to avoiding personal exposure to the parasite.3

    This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with OT in a cohort of Congolese patients with uveitis.

    Methods

    Study population

    A cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2020 and July 2021 in two ophthalmic clinics in Kinshasa (DR Congo): the Ophthalmic Center of Masina and the Ophthalmology Department of Saint Joseph Hospital. Patients who received a consultation diagnosed with uveitis were invited to participate in the study. The diagnosis of OT was based on clinical criteria16 19 in patient with positive Toxoplasma serology; and negative serology ruled out the diagnosis. Patients with active and cicatricial OT were included in the study. All included individuals provided written informed consent to participate in the study, following a full explanation of the study protocol. Children were allowed to participate in the study if consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian.

    Ophthalmological examination

    The same ophthalmologist performed a complete ophthalmic examination.

    Visual acuity was measured using a Snellen chart at a distance of 6 m. Biomicroscopy was performed with a slit lamp (Zeiss, Germany). A measure of IOP was made with a Goldmann tonometer. A fundus examination by indirect ophthalmoscopy (Slit lamp Zeiss, Germany and external lens of 78 diopters, Volk, Mentor, Ohio) after dilatation with a drop of tropicamide 1% (Mydriaticum, Théa, Milano, Italy) was performed for each patient.

    Serological tests

    All participants were sampled for serological analysis. First, 10 mL of the peripheral blood sample was obtained and centrifuged on the day of collection; the resulting serum supernatant was stored at −20°C until the test could be performed. Then, serology testing was performed in each patient by enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA, Biomerieux, France) using the Vidas R Toxo IgG II (TXG). The ELFA was performed with automated equipment (Mini Vidas, Biomerieux, France). Samples were considered positive for IgG antibodies when ≥8 IU/mL, indeterminate from ≥4 to <8 IU/mL and negative when <4 IU/mL.

    Questionnaire

    Each patient underwent an interview to obtain details associated with toxoplasmosis. In addition, questionnaires about general demography data, including age, medical history, and epidemiological and sociodemographic characteristics, were applied.

    Risk factors assessed in the questionnaire included: age; place of residence, socioeconomic status, contact with soil, consumption of raw or undercooked food; intake of unfiltered and/or unboiled water, contact with cats and type of occupation. In addition, patients’ professions were grouped into two categories, those presenting the most significant risk of contact with the parasites (breeders, farmers, cultivators, agronomists, etc) and the others.

    Variables of interest to determine a household’s socioeconomic situation were: the components of household amenities (possession of a refrigerator, a freezer, a stove, a motorcycle, a motorcar, a radio, a mobile phone, a bed, a mattress, chairs and a solar panel), the occupancy status of the dwelling (renter or owner), kind of toilet used, the existence of shared bathroom with other households, type of energy source, the primary type of fuel used for the household cooking, main roof material, primary material of pavement. The Wealth Index, a summary measure of socioeconomic status, was computed using the standard principal component analysis of household amenities ownership.

    Statistical analysis

    A participant database was established and validated in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington). Results are expressed as mean (min–max) for continuous variables and N (%) for categorical variables. Differences in proportions were analysed using the χ2 test. A logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors associated with OT, including sex, age, wealth index, eating habits, type of drinking water, and living environment. SPSS V.25 (SPSS IBM, Chicago, USA) statistical program was used to perform analysis. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    Patient and public involvement

    Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, analysis or writing of the manuscript.

    Results

    General characteristics of the population

    The number of consultations per year during our study period was 42 743 patients, including 371 cases of uveitis. The frequency of uveitis was 0.9%. We excluded patients lost to follow-up after the initial consultation. Our study involved 212 patients who agreed to participate. One hundred and thirteen patients (53.3%) were men. The mean age at presentation was 42.1±15.9 years (limits: 8–74 years), and patients aged between 20 to 40 years were the most represented (42%). The majority of patients had a secondary education level (57.5%). Patients with a median wealth index represented 36.8% of the population. Nine patients (4.2%) lived in rural areas outside the city of Kinshasa. Anti-Toxoplasma serology was positive in 86.3% of patients. Among the aetiologies of uveitis, OT concerned 96 patients (45.3%) (table 1). Among the 96 cases of toxoplasmosis, 24 patients (25%) had cicatricial OT. Other clinical characteristics of patients with OT have been previously described.20

    View this table:
    Table 1

    General characteristics of the population

    Characteristic differences according to serology and OT

    Patients with a positive T. gondii serology were younger than those with negative serology (P=0.01) (table 2). Patients with positive serology had more contact with cats. They consumed more cat, pork, and sheep meat and untreated water, compared with those with negative serology, but this difference was not statistically significant (P≥0.05). All patients living in rural areas had positive serology (table 2). Patients with OT were younger (P<0.001) and consumed more cat meat (P=0.002) and undercooked meat (P=0.009), compared with those with other types of uveitis. In rural areas, seven out of nine patients with positive serology have OT (77.8%), while in the urban area, 89 out of the 174 patients developed OT (51.1%), showing statistically significant differences (P=0.04) (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Patient characteristics according to serology and ocular toxoplasmosis

    Risk factors for OT among patients

    After analysis by logistic regression, the age of the patients below 60 years (P=0.001, OR=9.75 (CI 95% 2.51 to 37.80)), the consumption of cat meat (P=0.01, OR=2.65 (CI 95% 1.18 to 5.96)) and undercooked meat (P=0.044, OR=2.30 (CI 95% 1.02 to 5.21)) and living in a rural area (P=0.021, OR=11.42 (CI 95% 1.45 to 89.84)) were identified as risk factors for OT (table 3).

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Risk factors for ocular toxoplasmosis among patients with uveitis

    Discussion

    Worldwide several studies were carried out to determine the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in the general population. Most authors have studied the infection among pregnant women.8 21–23 The seroprevalence of the infection varies greatly depending on the region. In Europe, the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis varies between 10% in the north to over 50% in the south.6 21 23 In the USA, the seroprevalence varies around 11%. It is higher in South America, between 44% and 77%, with Brazil being the most affected country in the region.23 In Asia, seroprevalence varies between 10% and 60%, with countries like China and India having the lowest rates while the Middle East is the most affected.23 In Africa, there is a geographical trend of decreasing seroprevalence from the northern to the southern and from the western to the eastern regions of the continent.24 Central Africa has the highest reported prevalence rates of infectious diseases; the DRC has the highest rate among these countries.8 A study conducted in Kinshasa in 2014; by Doudou et al found a high seroprevalence of the infection in 80.3% of pregnant women tested.9

    There are few studies on seroprevalence and risk factors for toxoplasmosis in ophthalmology patients18 25–27 (table 4). In our series, we found a high seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis of 86%; it is higher than that found in the general population by Doudou et al.9 This could partly explain why toxoplasmosis is the first aetiology of uveitis in the DRC.14

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma infection and risk factors in studies on patients in ophthalmology

    The main factors associated with the significant variability in the distribution of T. gondii infection among geographical regions are socioeconomic, environmental and cultural differences as well as those related to the living and eating habits of the residents of a given area.5 28 29

    In our series, we studied the impact of several factors (sociodemographic, environmental and dietary habits) on Toxoplasma infection.

    None of these factors showed a statistically significant influence on the serology of the patients. The study carried out in Kinshasa by Doudou et al on pregnant women also failed to identify risk factors significantly associated with Toxoplasma infection.9 Other studies carried out in populations with high seroprevalence also failed to identify risk factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection.30 31 The high prevalence of the infection in the study populations can be the cause.

    Like us, Ferreira et al in Brazil did not note any association between Toxoplasma infection and patients’ age, socioeconomic level and level of education.25 However, in their series, infection was associated with the following risk factors: the presence of cats or dogs and consumption of raw or undercooked meat25 (table 4). In Paraguay, Samudio et al found their patients’ dietary habits as risk factors.27 (table 4). Another Brazilian study identified the age of patients between 31 and 40 years as a risk factor in their series.18 In Colombia, in a population-based study carried out in two urban districts, drinking untreated water was a risk factor for Toxoplasma gondii infection.32 In addition, in this country, soldiers operating in the jungle, drinking unboiled and chlorine-untreated water and eating wild animal meat had a higher prevalence of 33Toxoplasma infection (table 4). Finally, in a population-based study, in Ghana, sanitary conditions, contact with soil and cat,and source of drinking water were the risk factors identified for Toxoplasma infection34 (table 4).

    In our series, OT affected 45% of patients who consulted for uveitis during the study period. In Brazil, OT is responsible for 43% of uveitis cases.35

    The following risk factors were identified as associated with OT in our patients: the age of patients below 60 years (P=0.001, OR=9.75 (CI 95% 2.51 to 37.80)), the consumption of cat meat (P=0.01, OR=2.65 (CI 95% 1.18 to 5.96) and undercooked meat (P=0.044, OR=2.30 (CI 95% 1.02 to 5.21)) and living in a rural area (P=0.021, OR=11.4 (CI 95% 1.45 to 89.84)).

    In Brazil, Ferreira et al, in their clinical study, also found an association between the age of patients and OT. Like us, they note that patients with OT are younger than those with other ocular pathologies.25 A Brazilian population-based study34 found that older age showed no association with the presence of ocular lesions, unlike other studies that reported this variable as a risk factor for OT.11 34 36

    In our series, the consumption of undercooked meat would increase by two times (CI 95% 1.05 to 5.2) the risk of presenting OT. Ferreira et al in Brazil25 and Fuh et al in Nigeria26 also found the consumption of undercooked meat as a risk factor for OT in their series. In Ghana, no association was found between the development of OT and the consumption of meat.34 In Colombia, in a recent study, none of the factors studied was associated with ocular lesions in patients with positive Toxoplasma serology.32

    Transmission of human toxoplasmosis occurs mainly through ingesting food-containing cysts of T. gondii; this concerns 42%–61% of all cases, depending on the geographical area.2–4 37 T. gondii has been detected in different meats (sheep, pigs, cows, chickens and goats).2 37 Oral exposure to T. gondii through food mainly depends on parasite prevalence and people’s food consumption habits.37 However, while consuming raw or undercooked meat was consistently identified as a risk factor, the relative importance of the risk factor and the type of meat associated with it varied among different countries.2 37 In addition, consumption habits play a critical role in the transmission of T. gondii by food; the parasite can be inactivated through cooking, freezing and salting.37

    In our series, we found the consumption of domestic cat meat as a risk factor which increases by two times (CI 95% 1.14 to 5.4) the risk of OT. In the city of Kinshasa, many young people consume the meat of domestic cats after killing them. Through this practice, they could become infected by coming into contact with cat faeces that contain oocysts. Felids play a leading role in T. gondii epidemiology, as they can spread millions of oocysts, causing substantial environmental contamination.36 38 Due to their high abundance, domestic cats are likely the primary source of ecosystem contamination in many areas.4

    Nine of our patients lived in rural areas and had come to town to manage their ocular pathology. Living in a rural environment increases by 11 times (CI 95% 1.45 to 89.84) the risk of OT in our series. A study conducted in the military in Colombia found a higher risk of Toxoplasma gondii infection among the military operating in the jungle compared with those in the city (P<0.0001, OR=11.4 (CI 95% 3.8 to 34)).32 In this study, the high frequency of Toxoplasma gondii infection was correlated with the consumption of untreated water and wild animals by soldiers operating in the jungle.32 Unfortunately, the small number of patients living in rural areas in our series did not allow us to identify the factors that could explain the higher frequency of OT in this group of patients.

    Conclusion

    Identifying the risk factors for OT in an area is necessary; because it helps educate the population to avoid exposition to the parasite. We describe the first study on the risk factors of OT in Central Africa. In our series, we noted a high seroprevalence of the infection, higher than that found in most South American studies. The pathology would affect more young people, who constitute the active portion of the population. It would, thus, have a higher impact on the quality of life of the subjects. OT appears to be associated with dietary habits (consumption of cats and undercooked meat), identified as risk factors in our study. The prevention of the pathology will pass through information and education of the population to modify its eating habits to reduce the risk of infection.

    Limitations

    One of the limitations of this study is that we used a convenience non-probabilistic sample size. This may have prevented the identification of statistically significant potential risk factors. Population-based studies, with a more rigorous methodology, could help to identify other sociodemographic and environmental risk factors for OT. In addition, genetic studies would also be necessary to identify possible risk factors linked to the host or parasite characteristics.

    Data availability statement

    No data are available.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    This study involves human participants and was approved by Ethics Committee of the Medical School of the University of Kinshasa ESP/CE/047/2020. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Montoya JG,
      2. Liesenfeld O
      . Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004;363:1965–76. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Pereira KS,
      2. Franco RMB,
      3. Leal DAG
      . Transmission of toxoplasmosis (toxoplasma gondii) by foods. Adv Food Nutr Res 2010;60:1–19. doi:10.1016/S1043-4526(10)60001-0.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Saadatnia G,
      2. Golkar M
      . A review on human toxoplasmosis. Scand J Infect Dis 2012;44:805–14. doi:10.3109/00365548.2012.693197.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Aguirre AA,
      2. Longcore T,
      3. Barbieri M, et al
      . The one health approach to toxoplasmosis: epidemiology, control, and prevention strategies. Ecohealth 2019;16:378–90. doi:10.1007/s10393-019-01405-7.
      OpenUrl
    5. ↵
      1. Hernández-Cortazar I,
      2. Acosta-Viana KY,
      3. Ortega-Pacheco A, et al
      . Toxoplasmosis in Mexico: epidemiological situation in humans and animals. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2015;57:93–103:S0036-46652015000200093. doi:10.1590/S0036-46652015000200001.
      OpenUrl
    6. ↵
      1. Petersen E,
      2. Kijlstra A,
      3. Stanford M
      . Epidemiology of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2012;20:68–75. doi:10.3109/09273948.2012.661115.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Maenz M,
      2. Schlüter D,
      3. Liesenfeld O, et al
      . Ocular toxoplasmosis past, present and new aspects of an old disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2014;39:77–106:S1350-9462(13)00084-0. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.12.005.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    8. ↵
      1. Alsammani MA
      . Sero-epidemiology and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii among pregnant women in Arab and African countries. J Parasit Dis 2016;40:569–79. doi:10.1007/s12639-014-0558-8.
      OpenUrl
    9. ↵
      1. Doudou Y,
      2. Renaud P,
      3. Coralie L, et al
      . Toxoplasmosis among pregnant women: high seroprevalence and risk factors in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014;4:69–74:S2221-1691(14)60211-2. doi:10.1016/S2221-1691(14)60211-2.
      OpenUrl
    10. ↵
      1. Furtado JM,
      2. Winthrop KL,
      3. Butler NJ, et al
      . Ocular toxoplasmosis I: parasitology, epidemiology and public health. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;41:82–94. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02821.x.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Brandão-de-Resende C,
      2. Santos HH,
      3. Rojas Lagos AA, et al
      . Clinical and multimodal imaging findings and risk factors for ocular involvement in a presumed waterborne toxoplasmosis outbreak, brazil1 Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:2922–32. doi:10.3201/eid2612.200227.
      OpenUrl
    12. ↵
      1. Vasconcelos-Santos DV
      . Ocular manifestations of systemic disease: toxoplasmosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012;23:543–50. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e328358bae5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Dubey JP,
      2. Lago EG,
      3. Gennari SM, et al
      . Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012;139:1375–424. doi:10.1017/S0031182012000765.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Nsiangani N,
      2. Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D
      . Patterns of uveitis at the tertiary eye care clinic of kinshasa, democratic republic of congo. I J Ophthalmol & Vis Sci 2021;28.
    15. ↵
      1. de-la-Torre A,
      2. González-López G,
      3. Montoya-Gutiérrez JM, et al
      . Quality of life assessment in ocular toxoplasmosis in a Colombian population. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2011;19:262–6. doi:10.3109/09273948.2011.582220.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. de-la-Torre A,
      2. López-Castillo CA,
      3. Gómez-Marín JE
      . Incidence and clinical characteristics in a Colombian cohort of ocular toxoplasmosis. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1090–3. doi:10.1038/eye.2008.219.
      OpenUrl
    17. ↵
      1. Butler NJ,
      2. Furtado JM,
      3. Winthrop KL, et al
      . Ocular toxoplasmosis II: clinical features, pathology and management. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;41:95–108. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02838.x.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Mendes NHD,
      2. Oliveira CBS,
      3. Garcia CA, et al
      . Epidemiological and serological profiles of ocular toxoplasmosis in the municipality of natal, northeastern Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2014;108:656–61. doi:10.1093/trstmh/tru113.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Aleixo ALQ do C,
      2. Curi ALL,
      3. Benchimol EI, et al
      . Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis: clinical characteristics and visual outcome in a prospective study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10:e0004685. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004685.
    20. ↵
      1. Nsiangani Lusambo N,
      2. Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D,
      3. Mumba Ngoyi D, et al
      . Clinical and serological characteristics of ocular toxoplasmosis in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation 2022;3:1–6. doi:10.1080/09273948.2022.2140297.
      OpenUrl
    21. ↵
      1. Cook AJ,
      2. Gilbert RE,
      3. Buffolano W, et al
      . Sources of toxoplasma infection in pregnant women: european multicentre case-control study. european research network on congenital toxoplasmosis. BMJ 2000;321:142–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7254.142.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Mustafa M,
      2. Fathy F,
      3. Mirghani A, et al
      . Prevalence and risk factors profile of seropositive toxoplasmosis gondii infection among apparently immunocompetent Sudanese women. BMC Res Notes 2019;12:279. doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4314-0.
    23. ↵
      1. Pappas G,
      2. Roussos N,
      3. Falagas ME
      . Toxoplasmosis snapshots: global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol 2009;39:1385–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.04.003.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Hammond-Aryee K,
      2. Esser M,
      3. Van Helden P
      . toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence studies on humans and animals in africa. South African Family Practice 2014;56:119–24. doi:10.1080/20786204.2014.10855349.
      OpenUrl
    25. ↵
      1. Ferreira AIC,
      2. De Mattos CCB,
      3. Frederico FB, et al
      . Risk factors for ocular toxoplasmosis in Brazil. Epidemiol Infect 2014;142:142–8. doi:10.1017/S0950268813000526.
      OpenUrlWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      1. Fuh UC,
      2. Omoti AE,
      3. Enock ME
      . Clinical features and risk factors of patients with presumed ocular toxoplasmosis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2016;11:48–53. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.180694.
      OpenUrl
    27. ↵
      1. Samudio M,
      2. Acosta ME,
      3. Castillo V, et al
      . Aspectos clínico-epidemiológicos de la toxoplasmosis en pacientes que consultan por problemas de visión. Rev Chil Infectol 2015;32:658–63. doi:10.4067/S0716-10182015000700007.
      OpenUrl
    28. ↵
      1. Manuel L,
      2. Santos-Gomes G,
      3. Noormahomed EV
      . Human toxoplasmosis in Mozambique: gaps in knowledge and research opportunities. Parasit Vectors 2020;13:571. doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04441-3.
    29. ↵
      1. Passos ADC,
      2. Bollela VR,
      3. Furtado JMF, et al
      . Prevalence and risk factors of toxoplasmosis among adults in a small Brazilian City. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2018;51:781–7:S0037-86822018000600781. doi:10.1590/0037-8682-0214-2017.
      OpenUrl
    30. ↵
      1. Ayi I,
      2. Edu SA,
      3. Apea-Kubi KA, et al
      . Sero-epidemiology of toxoplasmosis amongst pregnant women in the greater Accra region of Ghana. Ghana Med J 2009;43:107–14. doi:10.4314/gmj.v43i3.55325.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Hung C-C,
      2. Fan C-K,
      3. Su K-E, et al
      . Serological screening and toxoplasmosis exposure factors among pregnant women in the Democratic Republic of Sao tome and principe. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007;101:134–9. doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.04.012.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Gómez-Marín JE,
      2. Muñoz-Ortiz J,
      3. Mejía-Oquendo M, et al
      . High frequency of ocular toxoplasmosis in quindío, Colombia and risk factors related to the infection. Heliyon 2021;7:e06659. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06659.
    33. ↵
      1. Gómez-Marín JE,
      2. de-la-Torre A,
      3. Barrios P, et al
      . Toxoplasmosis in military personnel involved in jungle operations. Acta Trop 2012;122:46–51. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.11.019.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    34. ↵
      1. Abu EK,
      2. Boampong JN,
      3. Amoabeng JK, et al
      . Epidemiology of ocular toxoplasmosis in three community surveys in the central region of Ghana, West Africa. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2016;23:14–9. doi:10.3109/09286586.2015.1089579.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. de Amorim Garcia CA,
      2. Oréfice F,
      3. de Oliveira Lyra C, et al
      . Socioeconomic conditions as determining factors in the prevalence of systemic and ocular toxoplasmosis in northeastern Brazil. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;11:301–17. doi:10.1080/09286580490515170.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      1. Portela RWD,
      2. Bethony J,
      3. Costa MI, et al
      . A multihousehold study reveals a positive correlation between age, severity of ocular toxoplasmosis, and levels of glycoinositolphospholipid-specific immunoglobulin A. J Infect Dis 2004;190:175–83. doi:10.1086/421505.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Belluco S,
      2. Simonato G,
      3. Mancin M, et al
      . Toxoplasma gondii infection and food consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-controlled studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2018;58:3085–96. doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1352563.
      OpenUrl
    38. ↵
      1. De Angelis RE,
      2. Veronese Rodrigues M de L,
      3. Passos ADC, et al
      . Frequency and visual outcomes of ocular toxoplasmosis in an adult Brazilian population. Sci Rep 2021;11:3420. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83051-0.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors All the authors participated in the planning, research and writing of the final manuscript. NNL: planning, conduct, reporting, conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data. DKWK: reporting and planning. DMN: conception and design. PAZ: analysis and interpretation of data. Ad-l-T: planning, conception and design, reporting. Finaly, NNL accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.