You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Original research
Exacerbation of visual hallucinations in Charles Bonnet syndrome due to the social implications of COVID-19
  1. Lee Jones1,2,
  2. Lara Ditzel-Finn3,
  3. Judith Potts4,
  4. Mariya Moosajee1,2,3,5
  1. 1Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL, London, UK
  3. 3Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  4. 4Esme's Umbrella, London, UK
  5. 5The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Mariya Moosajee; m.moosajee{at}ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) occurs secondary to sight loss, characterised by spontaneous visual hallucinations. Symptom manifestation can be influenced by social isolation. This research aims to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on patients with CBS.

Methods and analysis A prospective cross-sectional survey of 45 individuals with active CBS. Open and closed ended questions were used to measure patient-reported features of hallucinatory experiences during the COVID-19 lockdown and perceived episode triggers. Analysis comprised of descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and associations, supplemented with qualitative descriptions.

Results The survey was operational for 31 days during the COVID-19 pandemic (June–July 2020). The mean (±SD) age of respondents was 69.3 (±18) years and the majority (42.2%) had macular disease. Loneliness during the lockdown was associated with changes in the nature of visual hallucinations (p=0.04). Individuals experiencing greater loneliness were, on average, older than those with no changes to their feelings of loneliness (mean age 73.3±17 vs 60.2±19 years; p=0.03). Despite experiencing greater feelings of loneliness (67%), most individuals (60%) had not accessed support services for this reason.

Conclusions Around half of respondents in this survey experienced exacerbation of visual hallucinations during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may partly be explained by loneliness and/or environmental triggers. We provide suggestions to promote effective patient self-management of symptoms.

  • COVID-19
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000670

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Key messages

    What is already known about this subject?

    • Visual hallucinations in Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) can be a source of significant distress for people with sight loss.

    What are the new findings?

    • Approximately half of people responding to a CBS survey report exacerbation in disease phenomenology during the COVID-19 pandemic, including increased frequency and more problematic visual hallucinations.

    How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice?

    • Results suggest increasing social interactions, engaging in physical exercise and reducing news exposure may help alleviate symptoms in CBS.

    • Findings emphasise the importance of healthcare professionals being aware of CBS risk factors and are conversant with strategies to promote effective patient self-management.

    Introduction

    The COVID-19 pandemic has seen countries around the world in a state of mass quarantine (ie, ‘lockdown’) in an attempt to reduce the risk of coronavirus transmission. In the UK, public health measures have recommended people stay at home, restrict visitations and shield vulnerable groups leading to the social isolation of millions.1 These measures disproportionately affect certain populations, for example, older adults whose primary social contact is outside of the home, and the visually impaired, many of whom rely on face-to-face or tactile interaction. Negative consequences of social isolation may be felt most by individuals living with Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), a condition where social interaction, loneliness and anxiety play a key role in the manifestation of symptoms and individuals’ ability to self-manage the disorder.2 3

    CBS refers to the presence of visual hallucinations experienced by individuals with reduced vision. Depending on the study, the reported prevalence ranges from 0.4% to 30% among those with sight loss.4 Any underlying ocular pathology can precipitate CBS, though literature consistently identifies age-related macular degeneration as a risk factor.5–7 The condition is typically associated with older age; however, the pathogenesis of CBS suggests patients of any age may be affected.6 8 Typical phenomenology includes transient episodes of simple (ie, shapes and patterns) or complex (ie, life-like scenes, animals and people) hallucinations. Symptoms may persist for many years, with significant detriment to quality of life.9 Hallucinations occur without conscious volition and may be triggered by external factors such as trauma and stress.10 11 In these circumstances, symptoms may be aggravated and more overwhelming to patients, resulting in a reduced ability to cope and maladaptive behavioural responses.11

    Evidence suggests visual hallucinations occur as a response to changing sensory input to specific areas of the brain.12–14 This theory is supported by studies identifying reduced visual acuity as a risk factor for CBS.5 15 Yet, not all visually impaired individuals experience hallucinations, and CBS has been described in those with preserved visual acuity.8 16 17 Related theories suggest sensory deprivation as a result of social isolation may be responsible for visual hallucinations. For example, several studies associate living alone with onset of visual hallucinations.2 18 19 Due to the theoretical background underpinning social isolation as a potential risk factor in CBS, we sought to explore how the national lockdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has affected individuals with CBS. The aim of this study was to investigate hallucinatory episodes of patients with CBS during the lockdown and identify potential triggers for symptom exacerbations and to understand the well-being implications to enable better patient support.

    Materials and methods

    In June 2020, an online survey was distributed among members of a campaign group for people living with CBS (Esme’s Umbrella), and charities for people with vision loss (The Macular Society and Retina UK). Patients at Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust reporting CBS symptoms during well-being phone calls with eye clinic liaison officers were also invited to participate. Participants were given the choice of completing the survey online or by telephone with a member of the research team (LD-F). Patient participants were eligible if they had experience of CBS prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, with or without an official diagnosis, and were over the age of 18 years.

    The survey was constructed and administered using Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah, USA) and items were designed to measure how visual hallucinations had been affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are currently no validated instruments for reporting visual hallucinations in CBS. As such, bespoke survey items were created based on the judgement and expertise of the study authors which consists of two psychologists, an ophthalmologist and the founder of Esme’s Umbrella. The items were developed following consultation with patients with CBS and vision loss charities regarding the nature of complaints from patients with CBS, and was piloted prior to administration. Items consisted of both open and closed ended questions using a Likert scale followed by an optional free text box allowing respondents to provide descriptive information. The survey items are shown in figure 1, which were transposed to allow all responses to be measured and presented on the same scale (ie, ‘Yes’/ ‘No’). The original survey items presented to respondents were structured to allow identification of direction of change in symptoms (ie, increases vs decreases). In addition, the response categories were tailored to fit each item.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Response distributions for survey items among 45 people with Charles Bonnet syndrome. N/A, not applicable.

    Quantitative analysis consisted primarily of descriptive statistics which were supplemented with the qualitative responses. Χ2 test of independence was used to determine associations between variables. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine interaction between age and responses.

    Patient and public involvement

    A representative from a support group for people with CBS (JP) was involved in the study from the outset. A patient with lived experience of CBS helped to develop the survey questions during a consultation exercise. Specific contributions from both included advice on study design, including defining the aims of the study and feedback on the survey questions.

    Results

    There were 45 respondents over 31 days. Mean (SD) age was 69.3 (18) years with 60% being women (n=27) (table 1). Most participants reported having macula-involving disease (42.2%), and 22.2% had multiple ocular diagnoses. A range of hallucinations were reported, complex were most common with the appearance of people or faces (64.4%).

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Respondent demographics, diagnosis and features of visual hallucinations

    As shown in figure 1, 25 respondents (56%) reported increased frequency of visual hallucinations during the pandemic. Changes in the nature of hallucinations and emotional response were reported in 21 (47%) and 24 (53%) respondents, respectively. Participants considered physical exercise to have a protective effect against CBS, where 21 (47%) thought reduced capacity for exercise was responsible for changes in hallucination phenomenology. Almost one-third (31% N=14) of respondents believed that distressing media coverage during the pandemic was responsible for exacerbating hallucination frequency. Thirty (67%) respondents reported greater feelings of loneliness, and there was a statistically significant relationship between loneliness and living alone during the pandemic χ2 (1, N=43)=4.35, p=0.04. Despite the changes in disease phenomenology, only 18 (40%) had accessed patient support services through sight loss charities. Free text boxes allowed respondents to provide optional adjunct qualitative detail for each survey item (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Example of qualitative responses by survey item

    Χ2 test of independence showed a statistically significant interaction between loneliness and changes in the nature of hallucinations during the lockdown, χ2 (1, N=41)=4.36, p=0.04. As shown in table 2, participants reported larger, more complex, troublesome and disorientating hallucinations, describing greater difficulty distinguishing between hallucinations and reality. Loneliness was however not associated with other items related to CBS phenomenology including increased frequency, χ2 (1, N=42)=0.01, p=0.92, or changes in emotional reaction to hallucinations χ2 (1, N=39)=0.01, p=0.96.

    There was no statistical association between age and changes in hallucination frequency (p=0.55; Kruskal-Wallis test), changes in the nature of hallucinations (p=0.72; Kruskal-Wallis test) or whether respondents had accessed support services (p=0.79; Kruskal-Wallis test). There was a statistically significant association between age and loneliness, whereby those who were lonelier during the pandemic were, on average, older than those with no changes in feelings of loneliness (mean age 73.3±17 vs 60.2±19 years, Kruskal-Wallis test; p=0.03). In addition, those reporting a change in their emotional reaction to hallucinations through the pandemic were, on average, older than those who did not experience an altered emotional response (mean age 73.9±19 vs 65.5±16 years, Kruskal-Wallis test; p=0.03).

    Discussion

    People with CBS have experienced changes in visual hallucination phenomenology during the national lockdown associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. There is no established cure for CBS; however, patient education and reassurance play a vital role in improving quality of life.20 Treatment pathways in persistent cases include patient counselling and cognitive–behavioural therapy, with a theoretical basis for pharmacological modification of cholinergic, GABAergic, serotonergic or dopaminergic systems, or reduction of cortical excitability.21 An important health priority for people with CBS will be to mitigate the impact of the lockdown and subsequent isolation, ensuring they remain socially connected. The challenge will be to ensure all those struggling with visual hallucinations are promptly identified through effective surveillance and signposted to appropriate social support.

    Loneliness has been a significant and longstanding societal challenge, which has been amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic.22 23 A recent study found that loneliness was considered the most concerning aspect of the pandemic among the general population, more so than contracting the virus itself.24 Our results show that people who were lonelier during the lockdown were, on average, statistically significantly older than those reporting no change in loneliness (mean age 73.3±17 vs 60.2±19 years, respectively). This is perhaps unsurprising given the well-established association between loneliness and ageing.25 There was also evidence that respondents who had become more fearful and agitated by their hallucinations were, on average, statistically significantly older (mean age 73.9±19 years) compared with those without changes in their emotional reaction (mean age 65.5±16 years), which may partly be explained by increased loneliness. Circumstances in which poor health outcomes may be particularly acute occur when people find themselves unexpectedly alone, such as death of a spouse or partner and separation from friends and family; conditions which have become highly prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. The biological response to loneliness is also significant, for example, alterations in the immune system cellular mechanisms contribute to a weakened immune response, suggesting lonely individuals become more vulnerable to infectious diseases.26

    Our analysis highlighted that self-reported loneliness was associated with a change in the nature of the visual hallucinations experienced during the lockdown. For example, many respondents described how prior to the pandemic their hallucinations were typically unobtrusive and small in size. Lilliputian hallucinations are visual phenomena in which the hallucinations are miniature in size. During the lockdown these hallucinations had grown to become larger and more difficult to ignore, such as the arrival of a full-sized person standing in the same room. Similarly, in some cases hallucinations were no longer static and now featured movement. For example, one participant described being followed by a shadowed figure whenever they were walking, while others described feelings of claustrophobia due to being trapped by encroaching plants and foliage. This finding supports previous theories that sensory deprivation, as a result of social isolation, is associated with visual hallucinations in CBS.2 19 20 However, living conditions do not fully explain hallucination phenomenology as previous findings identify a higher prevalence of CBS among married individuals as well as those cohabiting.27 Our results provide convincing evidence for a link between loneliness and the nature of hallucinations presented in CBS. However, we did not observe a statistically significant association between loneliness and hallucination frequency or emotional reaction to hallucinations. One explanation for this could be the way in which the survey items were constructed, as the items intended to measure subjective changes in hallucination phenomenology. Yet if hallucinations were already highly prevalent and continuous prior to the pandemic which persisted throughout the lockdown, then it would be expected that no increase in frequency would be perceived or reported.

    Social support is often described as the most powerful remedy for loneliness,28 and thus plays a critical role in determining patient health outcomes. For example, a high degree of social support is generally associated with lower health symptomatology and better mental and physical health.29 30 People with greater social and emotional support in their lives tend to be healthier than those who are lacking in support.31 Prolonged isolation for those who encountered the lockdown alone may contribute to an increase in psychological distress due to reduced exposure to sources of support (eg, family and friends) and increasing the importance of personal resources such as self-efficacy and resilience.32 Indeed, we found that those living alone reported greater feelings of loneliness during the lockdown. Additionally, we identified age as a risk factor for loneliness. This finding contrasts with results from similar studies investigating loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereby an inverse association between age and loneliness has been reported.32–34 Such results could be due to older adults typically displaying a lower reactivity to stress35 and exercising greater resilience,36 while having more experience with being alone and with life-threatening medical situations.32 The association between age and loneliness identified in our study could be explained by a difference in the needs of visually impaired older adults compared with community-dwelling older adults without vision impairment. This outcome raises important questions regarding the manifestation of loneliness among the visually impaired and signals the need for strategies aimed to promote social participation and accessibility. In the UK, interventions to facilitate sociable contact with people with sight loss during the pandemic have been implemented, such as well-being phone calls to vulnerable populations, and charitable organisations dispatching remote counselling services, which may bolster psychological well-being and allay feelings of isolation.37 Our findings provide useful data about loneliness among the visually impaired during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may help maximise the effectiveness of targeted charity and hospital-based social support services. Yet it is critical to consider other factors that put individuals at risk of loneliness, not merely based on age, in order to effectively identify those who would benefit from intervention. Moreover, patients with CBS are often averse to disclosing symptoms due to fears that the hallucinations are indicative of cognitive impairment,38 therefore tactful inquiry as to the presence of visual hallucinations is essential when operating both remote and face-to-face ophthalmic services.

    A number of behavioural strategies may provide relief during hallucinatory episodes, including adjusting lighting and practising specific eye movements.39 Though limited, these interventions are based on anecdotes from patients and medical experts and are simple to implement, are of no cost and can be applied immediately. We provide the full toolkit in box 1 which may serve as a clinically useful resource for clinicians when consulting with patients about self-managing visual hallucinations.

    Box 1

    Techniques for minimising or eliminating visual hallucinations

    • When the hallucinations start, look from right to left once every 15 s without moving your head.

    • Try to touch the hallucination.

    • Stare straight at the hallucination.

    • Turn your head to alternative sides, then move the head towards each shoulder in turn.

    • Walk around the room or to another room.

    • Shine a torch from below your chin in front of (not into) your eyes.

    • Change the light level in your room or the activity you are doing.

    It is noteworthy that our data suggest many individuals were seemingly unperturbed by the lockdown, and a high proportion did not experience notable changes in their visual hallucinations. For example, 38% of respondents believed their emotional reaction to hallucinations was unchanged. One explanation for this could be habituation to CBS over time, as long-term or refractory cases may be better equipped with coping mechanisms or may possess greater resilience to hallucinations. While all respondents had experience of CBS prior to the lockdown, we did not capture details on individual CBS time frames and so cannot make further comparisons. Previous research has shown a lack of association between overall duration of CBS and negative outcome,9 suggesting patients may better tolerate hallucinations or adjust to their occurrence over time. It is also striking that, for example, 71% did not believe reduced access to healthcare during the lockdown impacted their CBS. This may be due to the strengthening of remote consultations or could indicate the success of public health messaging throughout the pandemic that hospitals remain open despite travel restrictions, and that people should not ignore symptoms that might require urgent medical attention.

    In this survey, 31% of respondents attributed negative or upsetting news stories to increased frequency and onset of more distressing hallucinations. Evidence suggests ‘headline stress disorder’, a high emotional response to ongoing media coverage, may lead to physical dysfunction and progression of underlying conditions.40 Those working in eye care must consider the impact of repeated distressing media consumption and understand its potential role in amplifying CBS symptoms. One management solution is to advise patients to stay informed via authoritative news sources, and to be prudent and critical about unofficial reports. For example, sensationalised news coverage from unauthorised sources during the 2014 Ebola outbreak is believed to have propelled avoidable stress and panic among the general public.40 While two-thirds of our respondents did not believe media coverage during the pandemic contributed to their visual hallucinations, a significant minority (31%) suspected a casual effect. Individual personal characteristics may explain this difference, as some individuals may be more vulnerable to news-related stress while others may gain comfort from feeling well informed. Nevertheless, we speculate that encouraging patients’ critical thinking skills may minimise risk of misinformation, which in turn could have clinically relevant benefits such as reduced stress and may help to harness positive attributes of traditional media.41

    Physical exercise is a well-established effective therapy for many chronic conditions.42 In this survey, 47% of respondents believed reduced engagement in physical exercise was responsible for changes in hallucination phenomenology. Tackling prolonged sedentary behaviour through sustainable home exercise programmes will help counter patient’s inactivity, which is a known risk factor in CBS. Given the broad range of ages observed in our sample (30–94 years), and likely large variability in clinically measured visual functioning, specific modality, frequency, volume and intensity of exercise will be dependent on individual capability. Healthcare professionals may wish to consider recommending suitable home exercise regimens for people with CBS at times where outdoor mobility cannot easily be achieved.

    This study has certain limitations. Our sample consisted of self-selecting participants which may have incurred a sampling bias, whereby those with strong opinions on the study matter may be more likely to complete the survey. In addition, survey methods may be prone to response bias. However, the survey was confidential, thus limiting the impact of such tendencies. We used only single items for each study domain. For example, when measuring loneliness, we relied on a single and direct self-labelling item. While this is a common means of measuring loneliness in epidemiological studies, there are important shortcomings such as the willingness of respondents to admit to being lonely due to the associated stigma. Direct assessment does not account for possible unawareness of loneliness and relies on the conscious recognition and verbalisation of feeling lonely, which may result in under-representation.43 Future studies in this area using alternative methods for indirectly measuring loneliness, such as the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale,44 would be valuable for comparison of results. There is a need for further research to establish risk factors associated with CBS onset and a greater understanding of environmental triggers and circumstances that intensify symptoms in CBS.

    We are yet to understand the long-term consequences of the drastic lifestyle changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Widespread isolation of vulnerable populations will likely persist throughout the rollout of vaccination programmes, providing unique circumstances that may lead to exacerbation or new onset of CBS. As we emerge from this pandemic, it will remain essential that all clinicians working in the ophthalmic sector are aware of the difficulties faced by individuals with CBS and be conversant with available management strategies while continuing to promote good mental health.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors wish to thank Retina UK and Macular Society for their invaluable help with recruitment.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Public Health England
      . Coronavirus (COVID-19). available online. Available: www.gov.uk/coronavirus [Accessed July 17, 2020].
    2. ↵
      1. Holroyd S,
      2. Rabins PV,
      3. Finkelstein D, et al
      . Visual hallucinations in patients from an ophthalmology clinic and medical clinic population. J Nerv Ment Dis 1994;182:273–6.doi:10.1097/00005053-199405000-00004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Vukicevic M,
      2. Fitzmaurice K
      . Butterflies and black LacY patterns: the prevalence and characteristics of Charles Bonnet hallucinations in an Australian population. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008;36:659–65.doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01814.x
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Pang L
      . Hallucinations experienced by visually impaired: Charles Bonnet syndrome. Optometry and Vision Science 2016;93:1466–78.doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000959
      OpenUrl
    5. ↵
      1. Teunisse RJ,
      2. Zitman FG,
      3. Cruysberg JRM, et al
      . Visual hallucinations in psychologically normal people: Charles Bonnet’s syndrome. The Lancet 1996;347:794–7.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90869-7
      OpenUrl
    6. ↵
      1. Abbott EJ,
      2. Connor GB,
      3. Artes PH, et al
      . Visual loss and visual hallucinations in patients with age-related macular degeneration (Charles Bonnet syndrome). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48:1416–23.doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0942
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Nalcaci S,
      2. İlim O,
      3. Oztas Z, et al
      . The prevalence and characteristics of Charles Bonnet syndrome in Turkish patients with retinal disease. Ophthalmologica 2016;236:48–52.doi:10.1159/000446295
      OpenUrl
    8. ↵
      1. Jones L,
      2. Moosajee M
      . Visual hallucinations and sight loss in children and young adults: a retrospective case series of Charles Bonnet syndrome. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2020;80:bjophthalmol-2020-317237.doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317237
      OpenUrl
    9. ↵
      1. Cox TM,
      2. ffytche DH
      . Negative outcome Charles Bonnet syndrome. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;98:1236–9.doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-304920
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Vukicevic M
      . Frightening visual hallucinations: atypical presentation of Charles Bonnet syndrome triggered by the black Saturday bushfires. Medical Journal of Australia 2010;193:181–2.doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03843.x
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Menon GJ
      . Complex visual hallucinations in the visually impaired a structured history-taking approach. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:349–55.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Asaad G,
      2. Shapiro B
      . Hallucinations: theoretical and clinical overview. Am J Psychiatry 1986;143:1088–97.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Zuckerman M,
      2. Cohen N
      . Sources of reports of visual and auditory sensations in perceptual-isolation experiments. Psychol Bull 1964;62:1–20.doi:10.1037/h0048599
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Painter DR,
      2. Dwyer MF,
      3. Kamke MR, et al
      . Stimulus-driven cortical hyperexcitability in individuals with Charles Bonnet hallucinations. Current Biology 2018;28:3475–80.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.08.058
      OpenUrl
    15. ↵
      1. Gilmour G,
      2. Schreiber C,
      3. Ewing C
      . An examination of the relationship between low vision and Charles Bonnet syndrome. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;44:49–52.doi:10.3129/i08-169
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Cohen SY,
      2. Bulik A,
      3. Tadayoni R
      . Visual hallucinations and Charles Bonnet syndrome after photodynamic therapy for age related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:977–9.doi:10.1136/bjo.87.8.977
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Lomo T,
      2. Singh A,
      3. Peters D
      . Three cases of Charles Bonnet syndrome in patients with advanced glaucomatous visual field loss but preserved visual acuity. Acta Ophthalmol;89.doi:10.1111/aos.14620
    18. ↵
      1. Holroyd S,
      2. Rabins PV,
      3. Finkelstein D
      . Visual hallucinations in patients with macular degeneration. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1701–6.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Teunisse RJ,
      2. Zitman FG,
      3. Raes DCM
      . Clinical evaluation of 14 patients with the Charles Bonnet syndrome (isolated visual hallucinations). Compr Psychiatry 1994;35:70–5.doi:10.1016/0010-440X(94)90172-4
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Carpenter K,
      2. Jolly JK,
      3. Bridge H
      . The elephant in the room: understanding the pathogenesis of Charles Bonnet syndrome. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2019;39:414–21.doi:10.1111/opo.12645
      OpenUrl
    21. ↵
      1. O'Brien J,
      2. Taylor JP,
      3. Ballard C, et al
      . Visual hallucinations in neurological and Ophthalmological disease: pathophysiology and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:512–9.doi:10.1136/jnnp-2019-322702
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Crewdson JA
      . The effect of loneliness in the elderly population: a review. Healthy Aging Clin Care Elder 2016;8:1–8.doi:10.4137/HACCE.S35890
      OpenUrl
    23. ↵
      1. O'Súilleabháin PS,
      2. Gallagher S,
      3. Loneliness SA
      . Living alone, and all-cause mortality: the role of emotional and social loneliness in the elderly during 19 years of follow-up. Psychosomatic Medicine 2019;81:521.
    24. ↵
      1. The Academy of Medical Sciences
      , 2020. Available: www.acmedsci. ac.uk/COVIDmentalhealthsurveys [Accessed July 17, 2020].
    25. ↵
      1. Perissinotto CM,
      2. Cenzer S,
      3. Covinsky KE
      . Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1078–84.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      1. Cole SW,
      2. Capitanio JP,
      3. Chun K, et al
      . Myeloid differentiation architecture of leukocyte transcriptome dynamics in perceived social isolation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:15142–7.doi:10.1073/pnas.1514249112
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Khan JC,
      2. Shahid H,
      3. Thurlby DA, et al
      . Charles Bonnet syndrome in age-related macular degeneration: the nature and frequency of images in subjects with end-stage disease. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2008;15:202–8.doi:10.1080/09286580801939320
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Segrin C,
      2. Domschke T,
      3. support S
      . Social support, loneliness, recuperative processes, and their direct and indirect effects on health. Health Commun 2011;26:221–32.doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.546771
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. Wills TA,
      2. Shinar O
      . Measuring perceived and received social support. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, eds. Social support measurement and intervention. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000: 86–133.
    30. ↵
      1. Hawkley LC,
      2. Cacioppo JT
      . Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2010;40:218–27.doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Strine TW,
      2. Chapman DP,
      3. Balluz L, et al
      . Healthrelated quality of life and health behaviors by social and emotional support: their relevance to psychiatry and medicine. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2008;43:151–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Losada-Baltar A,
      2. Jiménez-Gonzalo L,
      3. Gallego-Alberto L, et al
      . “We are staying at home.” Association of self-perceptions of aging, personal and family resources, and loneliness with psychological distress during the lock-down period of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 2021;76:e10–16. Advanced online publication.doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa048
      OpenUrl
    33. ↵
      1. Luchetti M,
      2. Lee JH,
      3. Aschwanden D, et al
      . The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19. American Psychologist 2020;75:897–908.doi:10.1037/amp0000690
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Palgi Y,
      2. Shrira A,
      3. Ring L, et al
      . The loneliness pandemic: loneliness and other concomitants of depression, anxiety and their comorbidity during the COVID-19 outbreak. J Affect Disord 2020;275:109–11.doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.036
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    35. ↵
      1. Birditt KS,
      2. Fingerman KL,
      3. Almeida DM
      . Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: a daily diary study. Psychol Aging 2005;20:330–40.doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.330
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      1. Ong AD,
      2. Bergeman CS,
      3. Bisconti TL, et al
      . Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. J Pers Soc Psychol 2006;91:730–49.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.730
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Bavel JJV,
      2. Baicker K,
      3. Boggio PS, et al
      . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav 2020;4:460–71.doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
      OpenUrl
    38. ↵
      1. Jacob A,
      2. Prasad S,
      3. Boggild M, et al
      . Charles Bonnet syndrome—elderly people and visual hallucinations. BMJ 2004;328:1552–4.doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1552
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Best J,
      2. Liu PY,
      3. Ffytche D, et al
      . Think sight loss, think Charles Bonnet syndrome. Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology 2019;11:251584141989590.doi:10.1177/2515841419895909
      OpenUrl
    40. ↵
      1. Dong M,
      2. Zheng J
      . Letter to the editor: Headline stress disorder caused by Netnews during the outbreak of COVID‐19. Health Expectations 2020;23:259–60.doi:10.1111/hex.13055
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    41. ↵
      1. Holmes EA,
      2. O'Connor RC,
      3. Perry VH, et al
      . Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:547–60.doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
      OpenUrlPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Jiménez-Pavón D,
      2. Carbonell-Baeza A,
      3. Lavie CJ
      . Physical exercise as therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: special focus in older people. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020;S0033-0620:30063–3.
      OpenUrl
    43. ↵
      1. Shiovitz-Ezra S,
      2. Ayalon L
      . Use of direct versus indirect approaches to measure loneliness in later life. Res Aging 2012;34:572–91.doi:10.1177/0164027511423258
      OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      1. Russell DW
      . Ucla loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess 1996;66:20–40.doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Footnotes

    • Contributors LJ devised the study, collected data, and contributed to the analysis, discussion, main interpretation of results and writing of the manuscript. LD-F assisted with data collection and contributed to writing of the manuscript. JP assisted with data collection and contributed to writing of the manuscript. MM devised the study and contributed to the analysis, discussion, main interpretation of results and writing of the article.

    • Funding Thomas Pocklington Trust and Wellcome Trust (205174/Z/16/Z).

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Ethics approval The study was approved by the London–Camden & Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee (12/LO/0141) and was conducted in adherence to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement No data are available.