Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Retinal arteriolar calibre and venular fractal dimension predict progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy 6 months after panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective, clinical interventional study
  1. Thomas Lee Torp1,2,
  2. Ryo Kawasaki2,3,
  3. Tien Yin Wong4,
  4. Tunde Peto2,5,
  5. Jakob Grauslund1,2,6
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Vision Informatics, Osaka University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
  4. 4Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  5. 5Centre for Public Health, Blackwell’s Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
  6. 6Steno Diabetes Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Thomas Lee Torp; thomas.lee.torp{at}


Objective We examined the hypothesis that baseline retinal vascular geometry in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) predicts disease activity 6 months after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).

Methods and analysis We included 47 eyes from 40 patients with treatment-naïve PDR in a 6-month prospective study. Diagnosis of PDR and disease activity was evaluated by wide-field fluorescein angiography (Optomap, Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). At baseline and 6-month follow-up, the retinal vessel geometry was measured on optic disc centred images using semiautomated software Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina (VAMPIRE, Dundee, Scotland).

Results At baseline, mean age and duration of diabetes was 51.6 and 21.4 years, and 62.5% were men. Seventeen eyes (36.2%) had progression of PDR during follow-up. At baseline, we found higher retinal arteriolar calibre (31.3±0.8 vs 28.8±0.8 pixels, p=0.02) and venous fractal dimension (FD) (1.257±0.011 vs 1.222±0.011, p=0.02) in eyes with progression of PDR as compared with eyes with non-progression. In a multiple logistic regression model, both higher retinal arteriolar calibre (OR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.64, p<0.01) and venular FD (OR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.27, p<0.01) predicted progression of PDR. Venular calibre was seen to increase from baseline to month six regardless of disease progression (non-progression 45.0±0.7 vs 52.7±1.8 pixels, p<0.01; progression 46.2±0.8 vs 51.0±1.7 pixels, p<0.01).

Conclusion Our prospective study showed that arteriolar calibre and venular FD at baseline were predictive of disease activity 6 months after PRP treatment in patients with treatment-naïve PDR.

  • retina
  • neovascularisation
  • clinical trial
  • treatment lasers
  • imaging

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Key messages

What is already known about this subject?

  • Retinal vascular geometry (calibre, tortuosity, fractal dimension) has already been identified as markers for diabetic retinopathy but predicting the outcome in activity of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) 6 months after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is, in the literature, sparse and inconclusive.

What are the new findings?

  • In this 6-month prospective study, we showed the arteriolar calibre and venular fractal dimension at baseline to predict disease activity 6 months after PRP in patients with treatment-naïve PDR.

How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice?

  • Structural retinal arteriolar and venular vessel differences could serve as individual markers of adequacy of PRP treatment in patients with PDR.


Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). DR is a major cause of visual impairment related primarily to either diabetic macular oedema or to vitreous haemorrhage/tractional retinal detachment from proliferative DR (PDR).1 2 These complications are seen more frequently in individuals with poorly controlled diabetes, hypertension and/or long DM duration.3 4 Long-term epidemiological studies have reported up to 75% will have DR 10 years after diagnosis,5 particularly in persons with type 1 DM.6 7

In the 1970s, the Diabetic Retinopathy Study reported that panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) reduced visual loss by more than 50% in patients with severe PDR.8 PRP is now the standard of care for eyes with PDR.9 However, currently all patients are given the same amount of PRP laser treatment. Some patients may, therefore, receive insufficient treatment, while excessive treatment may be given to others. Patients who receive inadequate PRP might have progression of disease with tractional retinal detachment or vitreous haemorrhage, while others who have excessive PRP may develop side effects like visual field loss, night-blindness or diabetic macular oedema.10–13 The inability to predict progression of PDR despite PRP remains an important gap in the clinical management of PDR. Furthermore, standard PRP treatment has been challenged by the newer anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. The protocol S demonstrated non-inferiority regarding progression of PDR and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters gained at 2-year follow-up.9

Advances in retinal imaging technology provide new opportunities to assess the retinal vascular geometry using semiautomated computer software. The literature predominantly reports on two different softwares used for accessing the retinal vascular geometry, namely the Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina software (VAMPIRE, Dundee, Scotland) and the Singapore I Vessel Assessment software (SIVA, National University of Singapore, Singapore). Such algorithms allow for a non-invasive quantitative way to assess the retinal vascular tree. A number of studies have found retinal vascular geometry to be closely related to the presence and severity of DR. Studies have reported on increased DR severity to be linked to narrowing of the arteriolar and widening of the venular vessel calibres,14–17 increased retinal fractals18 and changes in tortuosity.19

The aim of our study was to predict the outcome of PRP treatment in eyes with PDR using non-invasive structural retinal vascular measurements of fundus photographs. We hypothesise that retinal vessel geometry at baseline could be used to identify patients at risk of progression of PDR after PRP treatment.

Materials and methods

We conducted a prospective clinical interventional study of 47 eyes from 40 patients with treatment-naïve PDR, who were followed for 6 months at Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. The exclusion criteria were age under 18 years, pregnancy, clinical significant macular oedema or treatment-demanding cataract in the study eye.

At baseline, all patients provided a full medical history and underwent thorough mydriatic slit lamp examination (tropicamid 10 mg/mL and phenylephrine 10%). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photography with 45° optic disc (OD) centred image, were captured by a 3D OCT-2000 Spectral domain OCT (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), and wide-field fundus images and fluorescein angiography (Optomap; Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK) were performed. The baseline examinations were completed by measurement of blood pressure (Omron 705CP, Hoofdrop, The Netherlands) and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). All examinations were carried out by trained personnel.

After baseline examinations, all patients received PRP in two sessions 1 week apart using a navigated laser-system (NAVILAS, OD-OS GmbH, Berlin, Germany). First laser session was focused in the inferior half of the retina, and the second laser session in the superior half of the retina. Local anaesthetic (oxybuprocain hydrochloride 0.4%) was administered prior to PRP, and a NAVILAS 34 mm or 38 mm contact lens was used during the treatment session. All treatments were given by certified personnel (TLT and JG). All baseline examinations were repeated after 6 months. Progression of PDR was defined as new vessel formation, expanding area of minimum one proliferation or increased area of fluorescein leakage on angiography, as defined by clinical guidelines.

Rescue PRP was given for eyes with progression of PDR at follow-up month three, and progression of PDR was defined as progression at any point during follow-up.

Image assessment

Fundus images were captured as 45° OD centred images (3D OCT-2000 Spectral domain OCT) acquired at baseline, and month six were used for retinal vessel geometry analyses using the verified semiautomated VAMPIRE software. All images were graded by a single trained grader (TLT) in accordance with the VAMPIRE grading protocol. Details and validation have been reported elsewhere.20–23 In brief, the software automatically detects the OD and foveal area. If necessary, manual adjustment of the OD and foveal tracing are possible. The software places a three-zoned grid around the OD, located 0.0–2.0 disc diameters from the margin of the OD (figure 1). The three zones are labelled A–C (zone A 0.0–0.5 disc diameter from the OD, zone B 0.5–1.0 disc diameter from the OD and zone C 1.0–2.0 disc diameter from the OD), and the vessels are automatically traced by the software and labelled as arterioles (red) or venules (blue). Corrections of vessel-labelling and artefacts are done by the grader. We measured the following: central retinal artery and vein calibre (CRAE, CRVE) in zone B using a revised ‘Big-6-formula’,24 and the vessel tortuosity and fractal dimension (FD) in zone C.

Figure 1

Vascular Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina (VAMPIRE) grid placed on an optic disc centred 45° fundus image. Arterioles and venules are marked by red and blue covers, deleted vessel segments are white. Green dot=vessel-start, vessel-stop or vessel-crossing. Vessel grading is performed between 0.0 and 2.0 disc diameters from the optics disc. Three different image modalities are seen to the right of the fundus image. RGB, red green blue image.

Twenty images were masked and graded twice at two different timepoints by the same grader (TLT). The intra-grader intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated using CRAE and CRVE. The ICC was found to be of strong agreement (ICC 0.97).

Statistical analyses

All statistical calculations were performed using STATA V.14.2 (StataCorp), and p values under 0.05 were considered statistically significant. If both eyes in one patient presented with PDR, we included both eyes in the study. In order to manage potential intra-group correlation between two eyes from the same patient, we used cluster commands. Cluster commands allow for observations to be independent across groups (clusters) but not necessarily within groups. At baseline, categorical data are presented as percentage and continuous data concerning demographic data as mean with SD. Vessel geometric variables are presented as mean with SD. Differences between patients with progression and non-progression of PDR at baseline and month six were compared by linear regression. Multiple logistic regression was performed with retinal vessel geometry (calibre, tortuosity, FD) as predictors for progression of PDR (with adjustments for sex, age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c and total amount of laser spots). The ICC was calculated using the two-way mixed-effects model.


We examined 47 eyes from 40 patients. At baseline, mean±SD age and duration of diabetes were 51.6±13.9 and 21.4±11.6 years, and 62.5% were men. Mean±SD HbA1c and blood pressure were 70.9±18.1 mmol/mol and 154/85±22/14 mm Hg. At baseline, we found no difference between eye of the two subsequently formed groups (progression vs non-progression of PDR) in sex, age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, blood pressure, smoking or total amount of laser spots delivered (table 1).

Table 1

Demographic characteristics at baseline as compared with progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy during the 6-month follow-up

At baseline, we found a statistically significant higher arteriolar calibre and venous FD in eyes with progression of PDR as compared with eyes with non-progression of PDR (calibre: 31.3±0.8 vs 28.8±0.8 pixels, p=0.02; FD: 1.257±0.011 vs 1.222±0.011, p=0.02). In a multiple logistic regression model, a higher baseline retinal arteriolar calibre (OR 1.34 per one point increment, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64, p<0.01) and venular FD (OR 1.15 per 0.01 point increment, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.27, p<0.01) was independently associated with progression of PDR at follow-up month six.

We found a statistically significant increment in arteriolar and venular calibre in patients with non-progression of PDR from baseline to follow-up month six (arteriolar 28.8±0.8 vs 33.8±1.0 pixels, p<0.01; venular 45.0±0.7 vs 52.7±1.8 pixels, p<0.01), although this was not seen when performing multiple logistic regression. Furthermore, an increment in retinal venular calibre and arteriolar tortuosity were seen from baseline to follow-up month six in patients with progression of PDR, likewise this was not seen when performing multiple logistic regression (table 2).

Table 2

Changes in retinal vascular geometrical variables in patients with non-progression and progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy 6 months after panretinal photocoagulation


In this prospective study of patients with treatment-naive PDR, we found the baseline arteriolar calibre and venous FD to be predictive of disease activity 6 months after PRP treatment. Every 1.0 pixel point in wider arteriolar calibre at baseline was associated with a 34% increased risk of progression of PDR, and every 0.01 point higher FD was associated with a 15% increased risk of PDR progression, independent of other risk factors.

In patients with progression of PDR, we found the baseline arteriolar calibre to be wider compared with patients without progression of PDR at follow-up month six. Studies have postulated wider arteriolar calibre as a risk factor in the early development of DR.15 25 Furthermore, a gradual constriction of the arteriolar calibre has been observed with increased severity of DR.17 26 In a study by Broe et al, it was shown that reduced arteriolar calibres were associated with a 31% cumulative incidence of PDR after 16 years.27 However, the overall association between arteriolar calibre and DR is more complex, and studies conducted on large cohorts have reported on no associations, or even arteriolar calibre dilatation.14 28–30 The literature is seen to be very inconclusive regarding retinal arteriolar calibre, in different stages of DR. To our knowledge, no other studies have looked at differences in retinal vascular parameters between patients with and without progression after PDR-treatment. At the level of PDR, the retinal arteriolar calibre should be expected to be affected by different systemic and microvascular factors. Traditionally systemic risk factors like duration of diabetes, glycaemic and blood pressure control are believed to have an impact on retinal vessel calibre.31 Our study might indicate that the microvascular capacity is radically changed, when an eye reaches the level of PDR. The hypoxic load increases and neovascularisations are formed. Thus, dilating the arterioles in order to increase the blood flow to the new vessels in eyes with reduced or damaged vascular capacity.

The FD explains the complexity of the retinal vascular tree; thus, a higher value equals a higher retinal vascular complexity. At baseline we found a higher FD in patients with progression of PDR as compared with patients with non-progression at follow-up month six. This could be due to a higher hypoxic load in patients with progression of PDR 6 months after PRP, thus resulting in a more complex vascular structure. The arteriolar and venular FD did not differ between the two groups from baseline to follow-up month six. Earlier studies have reported on a lower FD to be associated with a higher risk of developing PDR.18 27 In an earlier prospective study, performed at our unit, we found no difference in FD at baseline between patients with progression and non-progression at follow-up month six.32 This difference could be due to the usage of two different computer softwares, the SIVA and VAMPIRE softwares. There are some evident differences between the two softwares. First of all, there is a difference in the postprocessing of retinal images. Furthermore, different mathematical algorithms are used to access the retinal vessel geometry.

Second, the SIVA software allows fare more grader-correction that the VAMPIRE software. The SIVA software allows for tracing of untraced vessels, correction of vessel crossings and deletion of vessel segments. The VAMPIRE software does not allow the abovementioned corrections. McGrory et al33 reported on the agreement in measurements between the two softwares and concluded that caution should be taken when making inferences regarding the associations between retinal measures.

Furthermore, the arteriolar tortuosity was seen to increase from baseline to follow-up month six in patients with progression of PDR. Likewise, on this matter the literature is inconclusive. One prospective study reported on increased arteriolar tortuosity in patients with progression of PDR 6 months after PRP treatment, while another cross-sectional study found no association between PDR and retinal vascular tortuosity.32 One could speculate, if increased tortuosity could be associated with increased retinal ischaemia. Thereby the tortuosity would increase in patients with an increased or high ischaemic load and progression of PDR in this group is seen despite PRP treatment.

In our study, the arteriolar calibre was documented to increase from baseline to follow-up month six in the two groups regardless of PRP treatment. As stated earlier, it has been reported that the arteriolar vessel calibre decreases with increased severity of DR.17 26 Thus, narrow arteriolar vessels could be expected at the level of PDR. After PRP treatment, the ischaemic drive is thought to be reduced, and thereby a dilatation of the retinal vessels could be seen. In our study, the dilatation of the retinal vessels regardless of progression of PDR at follow-up month six could be due to the laser treatment itself. In a study by Klein et al,26 the arteriolar calibre was found to be significantly smaller in eyes with PDR treated with PRP as compared with untreated eyes, although the time from PRP treatment to calibre measurement was unclear.

The venular calibre increased from baseline to month six regardless of disease progression. The literature is somewhat sparse on this topic. Prospective studies have reported on wider retinal venular calibre and increased incidence of PDR.14 34 However, a prospective study performed at our department on patients with PDR found no statistical change in retinal venular calibre at 6-month follow-up after PRP treatment regardless of disease progression.32 A change in the retinal venular calibre was not expected. Our findings showed an increase in the venular calibre that could be explained by a reduced autoregulatory function due to the long duration of DM, and the overall state of the vessels at the point of PDR.

The strengths of this study were the prospective design, and the use of a semiautomated validated computer software which minimised grader influence on the results. Limitations include the lack of refractive data on the cohort, and the relatively small sample size; larger cohorts are needed to investigate the disease process and its vascular characteristics further.

In conclusion, our prospective study showed that the arteriolar calibre and venular FD at baseline, using the VAMPIRE software, predict disease activity 6 months after PRP treatment in patients with treatment-naïve PDR. We found increased retinal arteriolar and venular calibre from baseline to follow-up month six regardless of PRP treatment. Hence, structural retinal arteriolar and venular differences/changes could serve as individual markers of adequacy of PRP treatment in patients with PDR.


This work was supported by The Velux Foundation and The Region of Southern Denmark. None of the funders have been involved in any decisions regarding this study, and the authors declare no duality of interest associated with this article.



  • Contributors All authors contributed to the formation of the study, and the execution of the manuscript. TLT and JG performed all patient examinations, laser treatment and collection of data.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The study was conducted in accordance with the criteria of the Helsinki II Declaration and good clinical practice. Due to the interventional design of the study, it was not appropriate or possible to involve patients or the public in the design. Patients were only involved in the study as participants in the cohort, and were not involved in the design, conduct or reporting of the study, as this was done by the study group. It was approved by the Regional (Southern) Scientific Ethics Committee (ID S-20140046), The Danish Data Protection Agency (ID 14/16546) and registered at Clinical Trials (ID NCT02157350).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.