Responses

Download PDFPDF

Diabetic retinopathy screening in persons with mental illness: a literature review
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    RE: Diabetic retinopathy screening in persons with mental illness: a literature review

    Bradley and Delaffon conducted a literature review regarding diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) in people with severe mental illness (SMI) (1). People with SMI have reduced attendance at DRS, because of poorer compliance with general diabetic care. The authors verified that anxiety and depression were barriers in attending DRS and strategies of preventative health programs such as DRS should be developed and prepared for people with SMI. I want to present two information.

    Chen and Lu reviewed the association between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and depression (2). Depression in patients with DR had a negative effect on the condition of DR, and they recommended psychiatric therapies for depression to achieve optimal prognosis in patients with DR and depression. Diabetes control is closely related to keeping good lifestyles including nutrition, exercise, resting and stress management. Taken together, diabetes supporting system in patients with depression could be developed by comprehensive medical and health care strategies.

    Khoo et al. specified that severity of DR, diabetic macular edema (DME) and vision loss were significantly associated with poor psychosocial outcomes (3). Bi-directional associations might be existed and increased incidence and progression of DR was predominant in subjects with depression or depressive symptoms. Based on a systematic review, they proposed two actions. First, prevention of poor psychological outcomes is needed by delaying pro...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.