Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Towards Clinical Trials in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Classification and Outcome Measures—The Bowman Club Lecture 2019
  1. Sanjay V Patel
  1. Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor Sanjay V Patel; patel.sanjay{at}mayo.edu

Abstract

The surgical treatment of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) has advanced dramatically over the last two decades. Penetrating keratoplasty has been superseded by various iterations of endothelial keratoplasty, and currently, surgical removal of host Descemet membrane without keratoplasty is being investigated. These surgical advances have been accompanied by significant improvement of our understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms, not least the discovery that FECD in western populations is predominantly an intronic trinucleotide repeat expansion disorder in the transcription factor 4 gene that results in RNA toxicity and mis-splicing. Understanding the disease mechanisms augurs well for developing targeted molecular medical therapies, which will require careful clinical investigation through trials to prove their efficacy and safety. As the field advances towards clinical trials, investigators should carefully define the disease state being treated and consider the options for outcome measures relevant to the type of intervention. FECD, and the outcomes of interventions to treat the disease, can be measured in terms of corneal morphology, corneal function and clinical impact. Standardising the approach for defining FECD and careful thought about the outcomes of intervention that are reported will help make the results of future trials for FECD applicable in clinical practice.

  • Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy
  • clinical trials
  • outcome measures
  • corneal imaging

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Presented at Presented in part at the 21st Bowman Club Annual Meeting, London, UK, 29 March 2019.

  • Funding Supported by Mayo Foundation.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.