Discussion
Although corneal tissue and its preservation solution should be pathogen-free before a transplant can be carried out, there are reports of corneal infection and endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation due to contaminated donor tissue.10 It is well known that traditional culture methods only detect a fraction of the available microbiota.11 Studies on the ocular surface have shown the presence of high bacterial load per 1 ng of total DNA.12 Dong et al13 reported 59 distinct bacterial genera on the ocular surface microbiome using 16S rDNA gene deep sequencing.
As there are multiple diagnostic tools available for the detection of an infection, the choice of the diagnostic method becomes important. 16S and 18S approaches are used to detect prokaryotes and eukaryotes, respectively, whereas shotgun is used for deep genome sequencing resulting into the identification and taxonomical classification of all microorganisms.14 Although 16S is useful for large number of laboratory or clinical samples, it offers limited taxonomical and functional resolution15 compared with shotgun sequencing. Shotgun sequencing can be expensive, but it has high-resolution data obtaining capacity, thereby enabling specific taxonomic and functional classification of sequences and identifying new microbial genes.
Eye banks that collect, preserve, process and distribute donated human ocular tissues, store corneas using two different approaches.16 In Europe and New Zealand, corneas are predominantly stored in an OC17 18 medium, whereas in the USA, Asia and Australia, most donor corneas are stored in short-term hypothermic conditions between 2∘C and 8∘C.16 The length of culture period (7–30 days) and the temperature (typically 31∘C–37∘C) of an OC medium facilitate the growth and detection of certain types of microorganisms.19 Endophthalmitis has been reported to occur more commonly if the donor had septicaemia.20 Septicaemia is a contraindication if the prospective donor cornea is17 21 22 stored in hypothermia. With OC, patients with bacterial septicaemia are not precluded as donors, as long as concomitant microbiological testing is performed.17 21–23 Antibacterial agents such as penicillin and streptomycin, and antifungal agents such as amphotericin B are usually used as an empiric cocktail in OC corneal preservation media. Conventional microbiological controls are currently performed using standard bacteriological media in aerobic and anaerobic environments, whereas Sabouraud broth is a routine medium for detection of fungi.24 Other options include the use of Bactec blood bottles (Becton Dickinson) incubated in the Bactec instrument (based on the detection of CO2 produced by microorganisms), which offer many advantages over the standard microbiological techniques.25–27 These techniques, however, only detect the presence of microorganisms but not their identity.
In this study, all the samples and controls showed evidence of the presence of microorganisms or its genomic content using 16S and 18S approaches. In particular, we also found same microorganisms in both, hypothermic and OC storage media. The presence of genomic material in the preservation media, however, does not necessarily relate to viable microorganisms in the storage solution. It is, therefore, not clear whether the difference between the 16S and 18S approaches and conventional culture reflects inhibition, but not eradication, of microorganisms by antimicrobials in the OC medium, differences in sensitivity and or the absence of living microorganisms or gDNA.
It is worth considering possible sources of the microbial DNA. It is possible that different genomic materials in our solutions could have come from either raw materials or packaging items when the media was manufactured. For example, genomic material of abundant microbes such as Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas and Comamonas spp. could have come from the industrial water. To produce highly purified water, microorganisms present in water are treated using ultrafiltration, followed by ultraviolet light that lyses the bacteria releasing genomic material into the media. The genomic material of Alcanivorax sp. could be related to the cap of the storage vial, as it is the only component that contains material derived from oil. The cap undergoes irradiation (beta or gamma), thus leading to release of genomic material. All the batches of the media were tested for 14 days in culture and the sterility in the industry is confirmed before releasing the batch. The presence of a low abundance of Brevundimonas sp. could be from the ocular surface when the corneas are cleaned with polyvinyl pyrolidone before placing them in the storage solution. It is possible that the genomic material of non-viable microorganisms may have stuck to the epithelial cells and would have been released in the storage media during preservation. Fungal (18S) contamination was at a very low abundance rate. Interestingly, OC showed a higher number of bacterial and fungal OTUs compared with that in the hypothermic media. Indicating that larger number of species could be possibly available when the conditions are optimum for the growth of an organism.
Comparing the two majorly used protocols of corneal preservation, we expected that hypothermic storage media would have less genomic material compared with OC, as OC preservation system supplements the growth condition (temperature and supplements) of microorganisms much better than hypothermic condition. The concentration of fungal DNA was higher than bacterial DNA. The absolute reads were higher in hypothermic samples compared with OC samples. As the medium is an industrial product, most of the organisms identified in our study are from the industrial raw material or water that may contain more organisms of fungal rather than of bacterial origin and therefore less bacterial DNA was observed in the samples. There are chances that such a variation could also have been due to technical issues but as all the samples were processed at the same time, this possibility could be ruled out. However, the raw materials and the final vials used for hypothermic media sampling are different than those of OC media. Some constituents or the materials could have been a possible source of more DNA concentration found from the hypothermic group compared with those from the OC group. Multiple factors such as different concentrations of antibiotics, media formulation, raw materials, downstream processing, temperature differences, etc could have also led to the presence or release of more DNA from organisms before, during or after preservation. Industrial procedures to detect live microorganisms is sufficient, but could be improved with more specific and sensitive assays like next-generation sequencing (NGS), whereas sequestered microbes in the tissue will not be detected and they have been considered to be the risk for infections such as endophthalmitis.20 Most of the DNA (regardless its provenience) came from taxa usually found in industrial water. Some of those taxa contain species that could be pathogenic. However, the amount of reads detected suggests that the actual contamination is negligible (if not just the background noise). All our samples showed negative results using Bactec colorimetric analysis, which would suggest that the samples were unlikely to contain sufficient viable microorganisms for the samples to be found positive, thus indicating that the currently used antibacterial and antifungal cocktails used in the respective media are also reliable for corneal preservation.
Aldave et al observed an insignificant increasing trend in the rate of fungal infection; they determined that it is not sufficiently compelling to pursue antifungal supplementation for donor storage media.28 In this study, we also report that fungal contaminants were found at a very low abundance rate. The other microorganisms detected that might have arisen from the cornea or the media may have been below the detection limit of CDC or were killed by the antimicrobials present inside the media. The 10 most abundant genera found on the ocular surface include Pseudomonas, Propionibacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Corynebacterium, Acinetobacter, Brevundimonas, Staphylococcus, Aquabacterium, Sphingomonas and Streptococcus,29 which were also observed in our samples.
16S and 18S data were acquired and analysed, which only provides data on the detection of genes and not necessarily viable microorganisms, which could be considered as a potential limitation of this study. This could, however, be supplemented with proteomics to detect live organisms. The other limitation is that the method measures only rRNA and therefore other genomic information is missing and specificity of identification is reduced. By law, if the storage media is contaminated, the corneal samples must be discarded. With further improvements, NGS could be advantageous by detecting the presence of genomic material in a short span of time and with reduced costs. A controlled comparative in vitro study of NGS and CDC with enrichment culture and removal of antibiotics in the medium is needed.
Current study showed the presence of gDNA in the negative control samples. A positive control of a known organism and concentration would have been beneficial for understanding the efficiency and sensitivity of metagenomics. Because of the high sensitivity of this technique, technicians must strictly follow a total sterility protocol avoiding contamination during sample processing. The cornea sheds epithelial cells during the preservation phase. Regeneration of these cells in OC particular, if co-infected by intracellular microorganisms, highlights the need for their detection by NGS especially as it has been observed that ocular surface contains a small amount of bacterial cells.
Metagenomic deep sequencing has the potential to improve the microbiological analysis of samples starting from low concentrations. The costs, presence of live organisms, turnover time, downstream processing and data analysis could be considered as limitations when it comes to routine eye banking procedures especially when the empiric solutions already seem to be relatively safe. Given the current trends in genomic technology development, the costs are likely to be reduced significantly and more narrowed and standardised results will be obtained in the near future. Wilson et al showed that with adequate staffing, the final protocol could be completed in less than 48 hours.30 NGS could therefore be of significant value for checking the microbiological load in industrial production to ensure the safety of healthcare products. Metagenomics has a role for detecting organisms with high specificity and sensitivity, which may also be important at the centres where Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) rules are stringent.