Discussion
Osteopetrosis is a heterogeneous disease, depending on the causal genes, modes of inheritance and disease severity (phenotypes). To our knowledge, this is the first study on the ophthalmic phenotypes of TCIRG1 mutations in Chinese patients with IMO. Our result showed that 12 cases had a frameshift mutation and 15 cases had a point mutation in the TCIRG1 gene.
First, from the aspect of onset, 58% (7/12) cases in the frameshift mutation group and 20% (3/15) cases in the point mutation group were severely affected in neonate, even in fetus. We found that, clinically, the cases in the TCIRG1 frameshift mutation group had a little earlier IMO onset age, compared with those from point mutation group; however, there were no statistical differences between the two groups. This may partly be explained by selection bias. Theoretically, the children from frameshift mutation group may have more severe phenotype, thus could be more easily attended and identified. On the other hand, children from point mutation group may have more latent onset or slight symptom, thus could be more easily ignored. For example, three patients (cases 4, 19, 23) who were treated with poor vision as the first symptom all had frameshift mutation in the TCIRG1 gene.
Second, from the aspect of severity, most of the TCIRG1-related patients (88.9%, 24/27) showed a severe ophthalmic phenotype characterised by optic canal stenosis with or without optic atrophy, nystagmus and strabismus. Moreover, the above ocular features from frameshift mutation cases were all more serious than those from point mutation cases. This finding can be ascribed to the fact that most TCIRG1 mutations, being frameshifts or stop codons, completely disrupt the protein function.12 For example, the two siblings (cases 25 and 26) who were homozygotes for c.1371delC had typical frameshift mutation, changing the reading frame (the grouping of the codons) and resulting in a completely different translation from the original. There was a similarity in the phenotypic features due to the same genetic factor in these two siblings, suggesting the decisive role of the TCIRG1 mutation of the disease.
Interestingly, we also found 18.5% (5/27) of cases with no frameshift mutation but suffered from severely impaired vision. For these three cases, the point mutations were all inherited from either of their parents who only carried one mutation and behaved healthy. We hypothesise that the following facts may explain such inconsistency: IMO is a sort of recessive disease, yet in some cases, only one allele was detected, or, as shown in table 1, the mutant gene came from only one parent. This means the mutation could have been missed in the sequencing, or there is a large deletion. It is also possible that there are two heterozygous genes at different sites that have not been detected. Kornak et
al, Sobacchi et
al and Susani et al had ever reported this phenomenon.6 12 13 The best explanation is that maybe an additional undetected mutation exists in these cases. On the other hand, not all of them had typical phenotypic features. 11.1% (3/27) of cases had relatively wider optic canal diameter, better optic nerve conduction in FVEP and more stable fixation ability at the age of onset. We did not know whether some environmental factors might modulate the severity of the disease, in addition to the potential for genetic modifiers. Anyway, such extraordinary cases showed that the clinical features of IMO were the result of a comprehensive effect.
To evaluate the clinical features, VEP supposed to be more valuable. It provides early clues for visual pathway disorders, and the electrophysiological changes are more sensitive than radiological abnormalities. However, for some cases, CT scan showed the extent of canal stenosis was significantly different between frameshift and point mutation groups, and VEP showed no difference in function. The answer is yet to know.
This study had some limitations. The small number of cases and the abnormal distributed data on onset age influenced the accuracy of statistical tests. It is expected to continue to observe the differences in FVEP data by increasing the sample size. In the future, the mutation at different loci in different genotypes should be assayed in both parents.
In conclusion, among Chinese patients with TCIRG1-related IMO, we found that the phenotypes of eyes were more severe in cases with frameshift mutations. Illuminating how the TCIRG1 gene mutation is related to clinical characteristics may encourage better understanding of the mechanism of ocular sign occurrence and more targeted treatment of IMO.