Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproducibility of straylight measurement by C-Quant for assessment of retinal straylight using the compensation comparison method

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Straylight gives the appearance of a veil of light thrown over a person’s retinal image when there is a strong light source present. We examined the reproducibility of the measurements by C-Quant, and assessed its correlation to characteristics of the eye and subjects’ age.

Participants and Methods

Five repeated straylight measurements were taken using the dominant eye of 45 healthy subjects (age 21–59) with a BCVA of 20/20: 14 emmetropic, 16 myopic, eight hyperopic and seven with astigmatism. We assessed the extent of reproducibility of straylight measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results

The mean straylight value of all measurements was 1.01 (SD 0.23, median 0.97, interquartile range 0.85–1.1). Per 10 years of age, straylight increased in average by 0.10 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.16, p < 0.01]. We found no independent association of refraction (range −5.25 dpt to +2 dpt) on straylight values (0.001; 95%CI −0.022 to 0.024, p = 0.92). Compared to emmetropic subjects, myopia reduced straylight (−.011; −0.024 to 0.02, p = 0.11), whereas higher straylight values (0.09; −0.01 to 0.20, p = 0.09) were observed in subjects with blue irises as compared to dark-colored irises when correcting for age. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of repeated measurements was 0.83 (95%CI 0.76 to 0.90).

Conclusions

Our study showed that straylight measurements with the C-Quant had a high reproducibility, i.e. a lack of large intra-observer variability, making it appropriate to be applied in long-term follow-up studies assessing the long-term effect of surgical procedures on the quality of vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Rijn LJ, Wilhelm H, Emesz M, Kaper R, Heine S, Nitsch S, Grabner G, Volker-Dieben HJ (2002) Relation between perceived driving disability and scores of vision screening tests. Br J Ophthalmol 86:1262–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA (1993) Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:108–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van den Berg TJ (1986) Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability. Doc Ophthalmol 61:327–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vos JJ (1984) Disability glare-a state of the art report. Comm Int Eclairage J 3:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beckman C, Hard S, Hard AL, Sjostrand J (1992) Comparison of two glare measurement methods through light scattering modeling. Optom Vis Sci 69:532–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coppens JE, Franssen L, van den Berg TJ (2006) Reliability of the compensation comparison method for measuring retinal stray light studied using Monte-Carlo simulations. J Biomed Opt 11:054010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franssen L, Coppens JE, van den Berg TJ (2006) Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:768–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cervino A, Montes-Mico R, Hosking SL (2008) Performance of the compensation comparison method for retinal straylight measurement: effect of patient's age on repeatability. Br J Ophthalmol 92:788–791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Rijn LJ, Nischler C, Gamer D, Franssen L, de Wit G, Kaper R, Vonhoff D, Grabner G, Wilhelm H, Volker-Dieben HJ, van den Berg TJ (2005) Measurement of stray light and glare: comparison of Nyktotest, Mesotest, stray light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter. Br J Ophthalmol 89:345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rozema JJ, Van den Berg TJ, Tassignon MJ (2010) Retinal straylight as a function of age and ocular biometry in healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:2795–2799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koch DD (1989) Glare and contrast sensitivity testing in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 15:158–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van den Berg TJ (1991) On the relation between glare and straylight. Doc Ophthalmol 78:177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Westheimer G, Liang J (1995) Influence of ocular light scatter on the eye's optical performance. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 12:1417–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin GS, Roche KB, Prasada-Rao P, Fried LP (1994) Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 71:750–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin GS, Stark WJ (1995) Current status of contrast sensitivity and glare testing in evaluation of the cataract patient. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 8:539–546

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo Guber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guber, I., Bachmann, L.M., Guber, J. et al. Reproducibility of straylight measurement by C-Quant for assessment of retinal straylight using the compensation comparison method. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 1367–1371 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1704-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1704-y

Keywords

Navigation